[Mr. 5]

I got it.
That's one hell of a time!
Congrats!!

Originally Posted by dzenno

mr. 5, sent you a file for verification

8.9sec 60-130mph
Pump gas + 70/30 meth
COBB stockish custom map (stock timing, stock boost, 12 AFR)
JB4 progressive meth upping boost to 18.5-19psi (too aggressive for pump gas and some timing was pulled)
FBO
Wavetrac LSD
Race Weight of car: 3540lbs + 225lbs driver = 3765lbs
19" wheels 245 tires front, 17" wheels and MT ET DRs on the back
Dual CM7 nozzles

Next time out it'll be on full weight again but on race gas instead of pump and I'll have my street tires on the back as DRs might be a tad slower at a low psi for 60-130 runs...i'll also try going down to a single CM10 nozzle for a bit less flow

FWIW, my best on stock turbos with weight reduction (seats out) 20psi and race gas+meth was 10.5secs

[dzenno]

Thanks man, appreciate it! More coming, winter weather in Canada FTW!

[dzenno]

Got an 8.73sec last night and actually managed to save it on the SD card, same setup as last time, full weight, pump+meth

Pump gas + 100% meth
COBB stockish custom map (stock timing, stock boost, 11 AFR)
JB4 progressive meth upping boost to 18-19psi (great timing, no dropouts)
FBO
Wavetrac LSD
Race Weight of car: 3540lbs + 225lbs driver = 3765lbs
19" wheels 245 tires front, 17" wheels and MT ET DRs on the back
Dual CM7 nozzles
3/4 tank of gas

I think I need to find a closed road with 3% decline or close to it somewhere...my current closed road and airfield I'm using is too horizontal (0.005% decline )

JB4 log of the run:

[dzenno]

Mr. 5, scratch my previous runs, here's the best so far, 8.2sec, .DBN sent over to your email address

COBB stockish tune (11AFR, stock timing, stock boost)
JB4 map6 + 50meth add (doesn't hold 20psi though, 12ohm should solve it)
100% meth
CM10 + CM7 nozzle
VMR VB3 19x8.5 rims front 245/30/19
Kosei K1 17x8.5 275/45/17 MT ET DRs rear
pump 94 gas
full weight (all seats in)





Some ppl asked about 100-200km/hr time (those in Europe) and here it is from the same file, 7.1 seconds..

[DefactoM6]

Damn. That's fast. Good going!

[39nas-t]

Originally Posted by dzenno

Mr. 5, scratch my previous runs, here's the best so far, 8.2sec, .DBN sent over to your email address

COBB stockish tune (11AFR, stock timing, stock boost)
JB4 map6 + 50meth add (doesn't hold 20psi though, 12ohm should solve it)
100% meth
CM10 + CM7 nozzle
VMR VB3 19x8.5 rims front 245/30/19
Kosei K1 17x8.5 275/45/17 MT ET DRs rear
pump 94 gas
full weight (all seats in)

That is sick! I am going to try to make another pass this weekend and see if i can get into the single digits... not like you though... Congrats on the great run!

[Mr. 5]

Updated the list.
Great job!

[DefactoM6]

Just did a bunch of runs...and I finally got a run where I didn't bog on my 3-4 shift, or hit traffic...and after analyzing the runs...got a 9.12. Screenshot below, file sent to Mr. 5 for verification.

Car/Conditions/Mods:
'09 E92 335i 6MT, fully optioned, ZSP, full weight, 1/4 tank of 93 octane.
OEM 19" 230s, 235/265 Michelin Pilot Supersport, 12mm spacers F/R
59 degrees, 75% humidity
1 shift

Procede V5 Rev 2A, 7-29 maps, 17psi boost setting, 0% IC
Homebrew K&N DCI
cp-e FMIC/oil cooler
CMGS trunkmount, 8psi full spray, CM10, 70/30 VP M1/Water
ACT Street
Macht Schnell 3" DPs
cp-e CL exhaust

[dzenno]

Awesome run man!! Try to capture a procede log of the run as well next time you run, just nice to have more info on it did you no lift shift into 4th? If not give it a shot next time

[DefactoM6]

Originally Posted by dzenno

Awesome run man!! Try to capture a procede log of the run as well next time you run, just nice to have more info on it did you no lift shift into 4th? If not give it a shot next time

Thanks!!! Gotta say, I was pretty pleased . I had my laptop with me to record the runs...but the damn thing died on me, which is what I get for working late and using it :P. If nothing else, the logs might help explain why I had a few runs in the 9.6 range with 60-120 times in the 8.1-8.3 range, yet my 9.12 run was a 7.2 60-120. And seeing what you accomplished with the NLS, I definitely want to buy the rev3 setup to try out the NLS, see if I can't get 8s out of it. I still want to try Cobb or the new Procede maps and do a full 4th gear pull and see what that yields...

[hotrod182]

Originally Posted by DefactoM6

Thanks!!! Gotta say, I was pretty pleased . I had my laptop with me to record the runs...but the damn thing died on me, which is what I get for working late and using it :P. If nothing else, the logs might help explain why I had a few runs in the 9.6 range with 60-120 times in the 8.1-8.3 range, yet my 9.12 run was a 7.2 60-120. And seeing what you accomplished with the NLS, I definitely want to buy the rev3 setup to try out the NLS, see if I can't get 8s out of it. I still want to try Cobb or the new Procede maps and do a full 4th gear pull and see what that yields...

Did you run in a different area on this run, or were they all with the same slope? (about 35ft decline?)
Great place though at around a 2.8% slope, just squeaking under the 3% limit!

[dzenno]

Originally Posted by hotrod182

Did you run in a different area on this run, or were they all with the same slope? (about 35ft decline?)
Great place though at around a 2.8% slope, just squeaking under the 3% limit!

Wow sweet decline I didn't realize that...nonetheless, still an amazing run...keep it coming

[DefactoM6]

Originally Posted by hotrod182

Did you run in a different area on this run, or were they all with the same slope? (about 35ft decline?)
Great place though at around a 2.8% slope, just squeaking under the 3% limit!

It was indeed a different area of Uzbekistani muddy cart path, all my other runs were at about 1.1-1.2%, in a place that is pretty perfect for doing 60-130s (highway, straight, 1% avg, 3/4 mile between entrance and exit, usually pretty empty)...to be honest, when I did the record run, I wasn't even trying for a record run, I had no expectation whatsoever of it being remotely valid...I figured it was too steep. Then when I analyzed it and it came in at 2.7%, I was stunned! What's interesting though is that in my normal place, I had 9.6es with slight bog on my 3-4 shift, with my 60-120 times in the 8.1-8.3 range. However, twice during my runs on the 1% slope, I got 60-120 times of 7.3 and 7.4, respectively, but I had to shut it down due to traffic both times before I could get to 130. So on my way to the gym, I did a run on the section I ultimately discovered to be 2.7%, because I was curious what my 7.3 or 7.4 could have potentially yielded. And with a 7.2 and 9.1 displayed for 60-120 and 60-130 respectively, I figured that it was safe to say that I would've still run in the 9.2-9.3 area on my 1% slope area.


Another interesting observation...at my normal run location (avg 1% decline), the run starts with a slight incline (about 10 feet), then progresses to a decline...what's interesting is that both the 7.3 and 7.4 60-120 were started well into the incline portion (where I was shifting to 4th on or before the decline), while my other runs with 8.1-8.3 60-120s were started with little to no incline left, and where I was shifting to 4th solidly on the decline (measuring from the start of the decline=1.3% avg decline). Not sure what it means, but I find it awfully strange that the quick 60-120s were set with significant portions of the run on an incline. Perhaps the higher load makes the car run itself harder? Definitely something to keep an eye on when I'm not trying to log with a dead laptop.

[dzenno]

Updated above 8.2sec 60-130mph post with the time for 100-200km/hr for those interested in those numbers (Europe)..7.1 seconds 100-200km/hr

Here's also some times in km/hr from some other cars I found on 6speedonline.com:

[hotrod182]

Here is my 5.95 second 100-200km/h virtually level run, in the 2008 335i Coupe.

[dzenno]

hotrod is this a verified run? which 60-130 is this?

[Dr. G]

Hotrod my man, you are friggen insane lol

[dzenno]

Originally Posted by Dr. G

Hotrod my man, you are friggen insane lol

His car/runs are what keep me motivated in modding my car only without nos my goal is to find means of getting down to those times eventually without nos which "should" be possible on RBs but it'll require a similar setup to his weight wise I think

His car is only 1.1seconds behind the Bugatti Veyron in 100-200km/hr!! That is TopGear material right there

[hotrod182]

Originally Posted by dzenno

hotrod is this a verified run? which 60-130 is this?

Yes...im pretty sure it is my verified 6.95 second run...just did the km/hr conversion. If only i had a DCT on the sedan....the power cutoff between shifts hurts my times.

[Dr. G]

Originally Posted by dzenno

His car/runs are what keep me motivated in modding my car only without nos my goal is to find means of getting down to those times eventually without nos which "should" be possible on RBs but it'll require a similar setup to his weight wise I think

His car is only 1.1seconds behind the Bugatti Veyron in 100-200km/hr!! That is TopGear material right there

His car is what has helped/motivated me tune a lot of my friends car's to be beasts with minimal investment.... Following his guidelines I've gotten a couple cars into the 11's with under $1000 spent (not including tires).

Was thinking of throwing nitrous into my car to pull into the low 11's... but I just hate the squeaking/rattling that comes after you start gutting your interior and putting it back together.... it just never is the same so I can't come around to doing serious weight reduction

LUCKILY... I have a buddy with a FBO+METH plus stupidly weight reduced 135i willing to give nitrous a shot.... come spring time it should be ready to do some damage.

We tried it a couple weeks ago, but were finding it too difficult to comfortably maintain traction at WOT even in 3rd so it was hard to get solid runs in.

Originally Posted by hotrod182

Yes...im pretty sure it is my verified 6.95 second run...just did the km/hr conversion. If only i had a DCT on the sedan....the power cutoff between shifts hurts my times.

Power cutoff is there due to the nitrous and AT correct?

[hotrod182]

Originally Posted by Dr. G

His car is what has helped/motivated me tune a lot of my friends car's to be beasts with minimal investment.... Following his guidelines I've gotten a couple cars into the 11's with under $1000 spent (not including tires).

Was thinking of throwing nitrous into my car to pull into the low 11's... but I just hate the squeaking/rattling that comes after you start gutting your interior and putting it back together.... it just never is the same so I can't come around to doing serious weight reduction

LUCKILY... I have a buddy with a FBO+METH plus stupidly weight reduced 135i willing to give nitrous a shot.... come spring time it should be ready to do some damage.

We tried it a couple weeks ago, but were finding it too difficult to comfortably maintain traction at WOT even in 3rd so it was hard to get solid runs in.




Power cutoff is there due to the nitrous and AT correct?

Yes, it is too much for the trans to spray during shifts. Would be awesome if the trans could take it, but I don't think it would survive eventually.

Driving with seats out is no big deal. No rattles, and car is more lively. It actually makes it easier to carry my new 5 gallon meth cans on the RF floor area, LOL.

[dzenno]

Got it down by 0.1sec from last time by going to a 12AFR base COBB map instead of 11AFR before, same meth 100% CM7 and CM10 nozzles, no lift shift...

Overview:

====
COBB stockish tune ("12" AFR, stock timing, stock boost)
JB4 map6 + 50meth add (doesn't hold 20psi though, wish it did, 12ohm should solve it but its not in yet...at the moment this is 20psi down to 18psi for majority of the 4th gear pull except post shift, see previous JB4 datalogs)
100% meth
CM10 + CM7 nozzle
VMR VB3 19x8.5 rims front 245/30/19
Kosei K1 17x8.5 275/45/17 MT ET DRs rear
pump 94 gas
full weight (all seats in)
==============

Here's the run, 8.12sec 60-130:




And for the European guys, 7.02sec 100-200km/hr:



Sent to Mr.5 for verification...