|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
405lb-ft of torque at the wheels?
|
|
01-18-2007, 08:28 PM | #133 | |
Your resident 4um troll
141
Rep 2,020
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
RAWRrrrr
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 12:16 AM | #134 |
Captain
14
Rep 710
Posts |
Makes sense. However, the Xede is only running 12psi. Shiv mentioned he once accidently had the boost up to 20psi. At 5,000 feet you only need an additional 2.5 psi to make up for the loss of air pressure. So I would think it would be able to compensate.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 12:20 AM | #135 |
1809
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
regarding tuned 335 vs. M5:
We're not going to be out-dragracing M5s just yet. Those cars are just silly. So sill, in fact, that outrunning one may be a tall order regardless of how we tune it. Without replacing turbos, we're going to it a hp bottleneck. We can make peak power earlier and earlier, but the peak number is going to be limited by physical airflow limitations. While low end and midrange torque make for a fantastically quick car on the streets, its top end output and gearing that pays off on the dragstrip. Re altitude compensation: I tested them the other day by logging absolute pressure (not boost). From what I saw, it manage to apply some sort of compensation. But it wasn't a full compensation. In otherwords, it only gave back a portion of the absolute manifold pressure that was lost from the low atmos. pressure. This was with stock boost settings and with the higher-than-stock boost settings. After a point, 0-60 times (at any altitude) are pretty useless for quantifying power output. For so many stronger cars, traction, surface quality and gearing play a much bigger role. cheers, shiv |
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 12:22 AM | #136 |
New Member
0
Rep 12
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 12:26 AM | #137 | |
Brigadier General
188
Rep 3,125
Posts |
Quote:
Dont even need that. Any ls2 motor has 400 ft lbs. That includes the $29k after taxes gto, that my friend purchased a year back when GM was having that employee sale.
__________________
Previous - E90 335i, E82 135i, E89 Z4 3.5SI, Range Rover S/C, Ultra White RCF, Maserati Granturismo
Current Lexus: SMG LC500 performance package Porsche:1973 911E Ferrari 575 SA, 458 Italia |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 12:39 AM | #138 | |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
Quote:
2nd gear: 4200 RPM (42 MPH) 3rd gear: 4600 RPM (71 MPH) 4th gear: 5250 RPM (107 MPH) 5th gear: 5850 RPM (142 MPH) 6th gear: 6150 RPM (169 MPH - theoretical, since limited to 155MPH) So in the lower gears that extra torque keeps the engine very close to its power peak of 350 WHP at about 6000 RPM. Even at 4200 RPM the car is making almost 300 WHP according to the graph, so that is the LEAST amount of power the car will see in a drag race. Due to the precipitous drop-off in power beyond 6500 RPM it might be just as fast NOT to shift at redline and instead short shift at 6500 (at least in the upper gears) in order to average more power acroos the power band. The M5's V10 is a high-revving monster that, when shifted at redline (esp. with a 7-speed SMG) will average a lot of HP per gear. Since 1st, 2nd, and 3rd gears are not as closely spaced at gears 4-7, there will be more of an RPM drop from 1-2 and 2-3 (to around 5K and then 5.5K) so there is a moment when the 335i will be making a similar 300-350 WHP. But once the M5 climbs above 6K it is lights off for the 335i. Due to extra weight of the M5 and less torque, I'll bet the XEDE 335i will match its 0-60 time, and be close in the 0-100 (half second off or so), but after that the M5 will walk pretty easily because it will never drop below 380 WHP and will average well over 400 WHP (410-415ish) in gears 4-7 vs. around 335 WHP avg for the 335i. This HP difference is enough to overcome the 12% weight increase over the 335i (4100 lbs vs 3600 lbs).
__________________
Driving sideways: It's not faster, but damn it's more fun!
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 12:40 AM | #139 | |
Bangin' my head against the wall
15
Rep 460
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 02:22 AM | #141 | |
Captain
32
Rep 815
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by edgarj; 01-19-2007 at 02:47 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 02:42 AM | #143 |
171
Rep 2,114
Posts |
ok just to clarify
my good friend has a brand new M5 we raced on the way from his house to work the other day. 1st 2nd and begining parts of 3rd gear my car was in front.....after that he would fly by me like no other. then we did a 2nd gear roll....this is where the 335 has the potential...i jumped out about 2 cars until middle of 3rd gear when would pull the car has all top end and low end we will beat it no problem from 1st 2nd and first of 3rd gear after that...we will get walked with a chip i dont know....i will post results after i get a chip... the owner of the M5 happens to be my soon to be roomate (we are buying another house together)...we race all the time on the way to work and leaving work. make no mistake a new m5 DESTROYS our cars! we keep up at low speeds but at high speeds that thing is a freaking monstor. Last edited by CASHBY; 01-19-2007 at 01:34 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 08:31 AM | #144 | |
Expert Road Racer
60
Rep 1,329
Posts |
Quote:
Just 1 thing to keep in mind, as speeds increase, drag will become as important/more important than weight. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 10:25 AM | #145 |
The 3 Day Diet!
20
Rep 630
Posts
Drives: Space Gray e92, 88 911 Cab
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Conshohocken, PA
|
roommate? you guys rent an apt owning a M5 and a 335?
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 11:30 AM | #146 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
188
Rep 1,853
Posts |
Quote:
Where in HB are you and invite me to come by and watch these races next time...
__________________
2008 335i
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 11:35 AM | #147 |
Private First Class
3
Rep 192
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 01:20 PM | #148 |
171
Rep 2,114
Posts |
hell no... we are not roomates yet actualy, right now we are in the process of buying a new house... he owns a house in irvine and i have my house in huntington beach currently... so we are going to buy another house and move into it and he is going to rent his current house out and im getting rid of mine in HB if you would like to buy it 726,000 so yea if you were trying to be an ass, know what your talking about first. not to be a dick... Last edited by CASHBY; 01-19-2007 at 01:40 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 01:43 PM | #149 |
Second Lieutenant
34
Rep 290
Posts |
Sounds like a xede 335i vs e60 m5 are basically the same to 100mph. WHich is what most of us will experience in 99% of our driving, I like the sound of that. So which one would win autocrossing?
The m5 is equipped with better brakes, suspension, etc. but the 335i shaves off 500 lbs. which is around 12% less weight. You don't usually go above 100 or even 80 in autocrossing do you? |
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 01:52 PM | #151 |
Free T_e_r_r_Y :)
223
Rep 1,706
Posts
Drives: X3MC, Audi TTRS MK3, 335is DCT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
|
I'd think the Xede 335i would need LSD to be better at Auto-x
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 01:52 PM | #152 |
171
Rep 2,114
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 01:56 PM | #153 | |
Private
11
Rep 93
Posts |
Quote:
The e39 is capable of trapping at 110mph and will walk the 335 easy. "Stock for stock the 335i will blow the door of the E39 M5" != true |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2007, 01:58 PM | #154 | ||
Private First Class
10
Rep 153
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|