|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Vishnu N54 Fuel System Research Part 2
|
|
04-13-2011, 07:51 PM | #133 | |
Colonel
85
Rep 2,291
Posts |
Quote:
I love to scratch the cat's back! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-13-2011, 07:53 PM | #134 | |
Major
159
Rep 1,289
Posts
Drives: 2014 435iX, FBO
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
Dzenno has 500/500 in his car - I guess limited by fuel - but Dzenno, can you get that current power down to the road and use it? What is the market for 500-600 rwhp cars in this forum? I would think 10% of 335i owners and that would be generous I would think. As someone else said, what else do you start to break (half shafts come to mind from members here) with this much hp and tq? When do you turn the car into a maintenance nightmare? For the masses - I would put the priority on: 1) the current Vishnu upgrade plan on their website listing what each upgrade gives you (this is great) - Priority 1 for me would be the new underhood meth kit out - people are lining up for that. That gives me (I think) about 420 at the wheels. Not too shabby, and from what I read, reliable and you don't break things. This would be more than adequate for 90% of the people doing these upgrades. 2) An out of warranty LPFP, HPFP and injector SOLUTION/FIX for ALL 3 series cars - the market for this is HUGE - but I wouldn't make them have to put in a procede to control it... just fix BMW's mess and start printing money - and allow people to replace things as needed (maybe). 3) the rest of the 10% of the people that want 500-600 - go full blown on this fuel system and go nuts, work out the bugs, figure out what breaks and then the market would get bigger - like maybe me.
__________________
2020 M2 Competition HS, DCT, 763s, Carbon: splitter, side skirt, grill, diffuser, wing
Previous: 2014 BMW F32 435iX - JB4, MHD Flash, BMS Meth Kit, ER Intercooler, intake, catless DPs, KW Streets, 437M Reps with 245/35 and 275/30 Michelin PSS 4S |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-13-2011, 08:10 PM | #135 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
390
Rep 1,571
Posts |
That all goes without saying, we all know the more power the more wear etc etc etc. My point is that its possible that with all the bolt ons, ENOUGH FUEL, good tuning, exceptional maintenance/servicing, and some general common sense we may find we can have a clean 500-600rwhp thats actually fairly reliable. I really wouldnt be shocked if the foundation is up to the task, and if so that would be one hell of a street car. Much beyond that, Im sure we are opening a pandoras box of issues/problems/upgrades... and quite frankly going any beyond that is way out of my range of interest anyway. I'd be content with a 475-550rwhp with a safety margin of fuel, but there again I prefer two wheels for the most part anyway so my goals may not match the next guys.
Anyway we must be reasonably patient to see where the stepping stones take us. But as said before though, if someone wants to go big or go home... totally gut their nice BMWs electronics and start over from scratch with all the facets of the platform more power to them for $30k+ in final hardware/tuning plus another $15k+ in trial and error, be my guest. Not my cup of tea, and I believe many others share the sentiment. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 07:31 AM | #136 |
Major
87
Rep 1,262
Posts |
Regarding our rods and crank, I don't think we should run into too many problems. The rods are fracture split single crystal forged
I think the weakest internal components are the pistons, which I think would be fine as long as you keep the IAT's in check..
__________________
Josh-
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 11:33 AM | #138 |
Colonel
336
Rep 2,663
Posts
Drives: BMW 335xi Sedan; BMW M3 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
|
High Pressure Pump info
__________________
335xi Sedan 6AT | Weather(70-85°F) | N54 Tune Comparison Chart || N54 Turbo Upgrade Comparison Chart
-PROcede Rev. 2.5 ~ v5 (3/17 maps) / JB4 (8/21 maps) / COBB (Stg2+FMIC LT Aggressive maps) †Procede Map2(UT 45 - IGN 40) Aggression Target 2.0 | 0-60 in 4.0sec || †Cobb E30 LT (35% Ethanol/65% 93 Octane) | 0-60 in 3.9sec AR Design Catless DP | BMS DCI + OCC | ETS 5 FMIC | Alpina B3 Trans Flash |235/265 19" Michelin PSS |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 11:58 AM | #139 |
Sees the world the way it could be
49
Rep 761
Posts |
So it looks like if we modify or disable those pressure control valves, overdriving the pump is a very real solution to increasing flow!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 12:10 PM | #140 |
Colonel
336
Rep 2,663
Posts
Drives: BMW 335xi Sedan; BMW M3 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
|
I believe that can be a solution if it can be done without any side affect.
__________________
335xi Sedan 6AT | Weather(70-85°F) | N54 Tune Comparison Chart || N54 Turbo Upgrade Comparison Chart
-PROcede Rev. 2.5 ~ v5 (3/17 maps) / JB4 (8/21 maps) / COBB (Stg2+FMIC LT Aggressive maps) †Procede Map2(UT 45 - IGN 40) Aggression Target 2.0 | 0-60 in 4.0sec || †Cobb E30 LT (35% Ethanol/65% 93 Octane) | 0-60 in 3.9sec AR Design Catless DP | BMS DCI + OCC | ETS 5 FMIC | Alpina B3 Trans Flash |235/265 19" Michelin PSS |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 12:15 PM | #141 | |
3474
Rep 79,211
Posts
Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com
|
Quote:
Well, I dont plan on keeping my car for one. Most of the reason is I dont like older cars, but what is selling me on not keeping it is the reliability aspect of this car and its quirks. Not to mention its limited capabilities, fueling. Coming up with a feasible solutions would certainly have me reconsider keeping the car a little longer, and maybe getting a few parts including bigger turbo's. But thats just me. So you could say there is probably other people out there thinking the samething as me. I'm not a person to use methanol as a fueling bandaid so thats why I'm on the sidelines on the search for 500WHP+ that way. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 12:35 PM | #142 |
Major
622
Rep 1,402
Posts |
So has anyone placed a fuel pressure sensor at the inlet of the HPFP to see if it gets the 72PSI all the time or if it falls at anytime? Nobody has datalogged this? WOT, low rpm, high rpm, etc.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 12:52 PM | #143 | |
Major
159
Rep 1,289
Posts
Drives: 2014 435iX, FBO
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
"So when running 72psi (vs 43psi), the pumps drew almost 20% more current. And lost nearly 30% fuel flow! More interestingly, the older, used Pump 2 responded more negatively than the brand new Pump 1 to the higher pressure, suggested that these LPFPs may not be capable of supporting the same maximum fuel demand over their full operational life. And when running lower pressure, both pumps offered nearly identical performance. This makes perfect sense since the pumps were less stressed at the lower pump speed. At 72psi: Pump 1.... 356 lbs/hr @ 12.2 Amps Pump 2.... 300 lbs/hr @ 13.5 Amps And at 43psi: Pump 1.... 442 lbs/hr @ 10.6 Amps Pump 2.... 430 lbs/hr @ 10.7 Amps " Can somebody explain this? Does the HPFP run at 72 PSI now? Does it NEED to run at 72PSI for the injectors - what am I missing?
__________________
2020 M2 Competition HS, DCT, 763s, Carbon: splitter, side skirt, grill, diffuser, wing
Previous: 2014 BMW F32 435iX - JB4, MHD Flash, BMS Meth Kit, ER Intercooler, intake, catless DPs, KW Streets, 437M Reps with 245/35 and 275/30 Michelin PSS 4S |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 01:02 PM | #144 | |
Sees the world the way it could be
49
Rep 761
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 01:04 PM | #145 | |
1806
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Quote:
Shiv |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 01:14 PM | #146 |
Major
622
Rep 1,402
Posts |
Nice to see the logged pressure drop. In the past on my 'old school' GMC Syclone when tuned to 450+HP I watched the FP like a hawk. If there was drop in FP I would get off it quickly. Whatever the cause, a drop in FP meant lean conditions and detonation and broken parts.
Why doesn't anyone monitor their FP? No guages? |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 01:17 PM | #147 |
Banned
118
Rep 4,771
Posts |
So any idea of when we'll see part 3 of this write-up? It seems you have a pretty good idea what's going on and I suspect that you have already started testing the solutions...
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 02:11 PM | #148 |
Vishnu Powered
74
Rep 2,205
Posts |
What about the 1M? Is the LPFP the same as the rest of our N54 cars?
__________________
2008 335xi Sedan | Titanium Silver | Black Dakota
PROcede v5 | Vishnu Exhaust | BMS DCI | AR Catless DPs | Helix FMIC | Stett Charge w/ Tial BOV | MORR VS8s | KWv3 |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 02:14 PM | #149 |
Colonel
336
Rep 2,663
Posts
Drives: BMW 335xi Sedan; BMW M3 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
|
I would probably think so. The 1M is not a 450+ HP car.
__________________
335xi Sedan 6AT | Weather(70-85°F) | N54 Tune Comparison Chart || N54 Turbo Upgrade Comparison Chart
-PROcede Rev. 2.5 ~ v5 (3/17 maps) / JB4 (8/21 maps) / COBB (Stg2+FMIC LT Aggressive maps) †Procede Map2(UT 45 - IGN 40) Aggression Target 2.0 | 0-60 in 4.0sec || †Cobb E30 LT (35% Ethanol/65% 93 Octane) | 0-60 in 3.9sec AR Design Catless DP | BMS DCI + OCC | ETS 5 FMIC | Alpina B3 Trans Flash |235/265 19" Michelin PSS |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 02:43 PM | #150 |
Major
159
Rep 1,289
Posts
Drives: 2014 435iX, FBO
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
you know... this is a pretty good question... if the 1M has a pretty big defect like we have, BMW may actually have to fix this.... can't have the precious "M" cars have big defects... can we.
What does the 1M have... 335hp or something... that maybe be good for parallel parking, but if I got one, there would be some serious upgrades going into that.... then you would have something !
__________________
2020 M2 Competition HS, DCT, 763s, Carbon: splitter, side skirt, grill, diffuser, wing
Previous: 2014 BMW F32 435iX - JB4, MHD Flash, BMS Meth Kit, ER Intercooler, intake, catless DPs, KW Streets, 437M Reps with 245/35 and 275/30 Michelin PSS 4S |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 02:50 PM | #151 |
Banned
118
Rep 4,771
Posts |
As long as the pump doesn't fail at stock boost levels, then BMW doesn't have to do anything. In fact, they would probably love it if the 1M was impossible to mod. They'd still sell a ton of them
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 03:19 PM | #152 |
Lieutenant Colonel
105
Rep 1,520
Posts |
This reminds me. I think i logged fuel pressures on my last dyno runs months ago via ob2 Dyno jet logger.
it logged a ton of different sensors, i remember a few of them relating to fuel. I'll try to dig them up |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 05:10 PM | #153 | |
Second Lieutenant
79
Rep 230
Posts |
Quote:
While in theory this sounds simple, if we're going to be setting up a standard PI fuel system & swapping over to a PI head/manifold (assuming one of the NA heads will bolt up to the N54 short block), it's also a fantastic idea to factor in the cost of lower compression pistons, as the 10.3:1 CR isn't going to play very nice with 15+psi of boost on pump gas, and while we're at it, we're going to need to likely swap over to a standalone EM system in order to control fueling since the MSD80/81 was programmed to run DI.... honestly, at that point, you might as well just sell your 335, pick up a 328, build it and boost it if you want to stay on the same chassis. Although, if I was after 600-700whp power levels, and drag racing was my main concern, I might consider switching to a different platform *cough*American V8*couch*. Realize that aftermarket vendors for other DI platforms (VW & the Mazda MZR engine come to mind) have come up with HPFP solutions that are significantly cheaper/easier to install than what you have proposed. I don't know about you, but while aftermarket DI components are not as easily supplied as many PI-based applications, I'm not ready to give up the additional detonation resistance that DI seems to bring to the table (hence the uber-high compression ratios & ability to run lean AFR's under load without catastrophic failure). That's just me though. Just my $.02
__________________
2018 BMW M2 6MT (weekend) - 2021 Mazda 3 Turbo (daily) - 2008 BMW 128i 6MT (track car)
https://www.investigatingtheapex.com/ |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2011, 06:02 PM | #154 |
Major
26
Rep 1,211
Posts |
so what Questforpower is saying is "don't develop or move our platform forward, turn it into something we know how to work on and has been around for decades"
Last edited by JoeyFiasco; 04-14-2011 at 07:48 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|