|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
330D DPF removal
|
|
09-11-2017, 06:23 AM | #1 |
New Member
4
Rep 19
Posts |
330D DPF removal
Can someone please explain why is a remap need after or during the DPF removal other than to not have the DPF message come up on the iDrive?
Without the DPF the car will not regenerate as the pre/post DPF back-pressure and temperatures will not be in spec for a DPF regeneration. Assuming I'm not looking for power increase through remapping, the car/engine should run as before but with less, or none at all, exhaust back-pressure and with lower EGT. Yes, a remap would instruct the DDE to not look for parameters for a DPF regeneration and the DPF failed regeneration message would not come on after 15 minutes of driving but other than that what else does remapping do? |
09-11-2017, 08:28 AM | #3 |
New Member
4
Rep 19
Posts |
I've read everything I could find about the DPF on the M57N2 and nothing says it has to be there. Some cars, pre 2005, even came without it.
My car is a 2005 330xD and about four years ago someone gutted the DPF but did not do the remap. Car ran OK but every time I started the car after driving for about 15 minutes the DPF message would pop up on the iDrive. I guess it takes about 15 minutes for the car to reach regen temperature. Last week I installed the second hand DPF, after washing it with a hot (90 C) pressure washer for about 45 minutes from both ends. Use a air compressor to blow out any water remaining in the DPF then put the DPF in a recirculating oven overnight to get it completely dry. I don't have a way to measure back-pressure but the DPF felt OK when I put in some pressure air through it. After repairing the EGR on the car I requested a DPF regen and it looked like it was happening...loss of power to the point I could not drive more than 10Km/H and had to pull over, lots of smoke out the back, EGT over 500 C, ...After about five minutes the car ran fine again. Power as before the DPF got replaced...until this morning when I believe the DDE requested another regen and this time I was down to less than 5 Km/H and eventually the engine stopped under load. Engine ran fine without load and would rev OK but not while driving. Now I'm tempted to get the DPF removed again and wanted to know more from the forum as to why we need a remap of the DDE...mostly out of curiosity but also to learn. I know the DPF can cause many problems but it also solves some issues like particle pollution...but not in a car I can't drive, so it may be back to no DPF, as much as I hate to do it. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2017, 11:07 AM | #4 |
BRR tuned
220
Rep 646
Posts |
in the states 2006 the DPF became mandatory on all diesels, cars pre 2006 did not require one. people with 2005 and older could run straight pipes with no issues. 2006 and older needed some type of computer tuning to turn the DPF off.
you may need to look in your regional section? |
Appreciate
0
|
09-12-2017, 08:40 AM | #5 | |
Lieutenant
114
Rep 410
Posts |
Quote:
Gutting the DPF also creates problems in reliably setting the turbo. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2017, 02:09 PM | #6 |
New Member
4
Rep 19
Posts |
Ken,
So, the back-pressure provided by the DPF keeps the turbo in check and keeps it from spooling up too fast. The more I learn about the DPF the more I like the AddBlue system or no DPF at all. No DPF has it's drawback too...particulates=soot. I just wished the DPF was easier to service and/or less expensive. Catalytic converters seem to perform forever, unless you happen to cool one off to quick and crack the ceramic core. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2017, 08:32 PM | #7 | |
Lieutenant
114
Rep 410
Posts |
Quote:
Plenty of North American members have DP and tune solution, maybe someone with the cat installed could provide feedback? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-14-2017, 01:54 PM | #8 | |
Brigadier General
770
Rep 3,555
Posts |
Quote:
Back on the cat clog, think about people having to change cats on a gasser from running leaded fuel or really high miles. I'm not trying to come across as a heavy authoritarian type here. Just sounds like trouble to me. I have 3 choices to run here 1) gutted DPF 2) catted down pipe and 3) open downpipe. I'm in a position to compare. I durn sure don't want to put the DPF back again if it comes down. It was a BEAR to reinstall after gutting/welding shut. Downpipe is a walk in the park in comparison to install. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-15-2017, 02:02 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant
114
Rep 410
Posts |
In compression ignition engines a two way DOC will reduce carbon (soot) as the carbon particles have a layer of hydrocarbon on the outside. As the DOC can oxidise hydrocarbons (unburnt and partially burnt fuel to water & CO2) it therefore will reduce particulate matter upto 25%.
As the OEM DPF has a DOC prior to the particulate filter the carbon (soot) that is not handled by the DOC passes through and is filtered by the particulate filter. It is the particulate filter which becomes obstructed and requires a regen not the DOC. In a petrol powered vehicle the three way catalytic converter handles nitrogen oxides and cannot be compared with a two way DOC. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-15-2017, 09:06 PM | #10 |
Brigadier General
770
Rep 3,555
Posts |
Thanks, Ken. I'll go look at this to learn more about 2 way cats. My DOC is way more effective at reducing stink than the generic cat in one of the down pipes.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-02-2017, 06:11 PM | #11 |
Enlisted Member
5
Rep 31
Posts |
I have a catted downpipe currently, and I just purchased a new Buzzken downpipe w/ integral DOC (brand new model from Ken D).
The wife really was not a fan of the smell with the catted downpipe, and the DOC is supposed to perform much better. I'm looking forward to getting it installed, and I should be able to do a direct comparison. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|