[ThomasMartin]

I know every countries Dyno's read differently and correct values differently but the main thing when measuring power is measuring on the same dyno and with the same conditions.

I have attached my first Dyno's that i took with V1.47 95 RON fuel no air filter, we measure in KW and NM. 290kw and 570NM. The KW Graph shows run 1 my old run with 1.47 and run 2 is V2.Today i did another dyno run and gave the V2 exactly what it needed more air "K&N Air filter" and more octane, only 102 RON fuel in tank. Max power up to 309 KW an Torque flew threw the roof at 670NM at 96% settings. These numbers are corrected for sea level.

I asked the guys not to correct but they said that they couldnt change the dyno setting as they had other cars ready to be tested.

All i have to say is wow the car neeeeeeded the air filter at this high altitude and its loving the high octane!!!!!

To SHIV " My appologies for driving you mad over having a slow car"

[e.n335]

Originally Posted by ThomasMartin

I know every countries Dyno's read differently and correct values differently but the main thing when measuring power is measuring on the same dyno and with the same conditions.

I have attached my first Dyno's that i took with V1.47 95 RON fuel no air filter, we measure in KW and NM. 290kw and 570NM. The KW Graph shows run 1 my old run with 1.47 and run 2 is V2.Today i did another dyno run and gave the V2 exactly what it needed more air "K&N Air filter" and more octane, only 102 RON fuel in tank. Max power up to 309 KW an Torque flew threw the roof at 670NM at 96% settings. These numbers are corrected for sea level.

I asked the guys not to correct but they said that they couldnt change the dyno setting as they had other cars ready to be tested.

All i have to say is wow the car neeeeeeded the air filter at this high altitude and its loving the high octane!!!!!

To SHIV " My appologies for driving you mad over having a slow car"

Congratulations. It seems we all should see with which intake mod Shiv comes up with. 309 KW = 415 hp and 670 NM = 495 lbft. Numbers are @ the wheels ? You had 380 hp and 420 lbft with v1.47 already. Do you have other mods ?

- Eugen

[ThomasMartin]

Originally Posted by e.n335

Congratulations. It seems we all should see with which intake mod Shiv comes up with. 309 KW = 415 hp and 670 NM = 495 lbft. Numbers are @ the wheels ? You had 380 hp and 420 lbft with v1.47 already. Do you have other mods ?

- Eugen

wil confirm tomorrow but i doubt they are @ the wheels far to high numbers. But at the very least i know there was an increase.

With 1.47 that was the only mod now i have K&N air filter and running 102 RON octane.

[Moth]

Subtract 12% and his dyno will be inline with everything else we've been seeing for the last few weeks. I do wish his numbers were uncorrected though. That dyno is most likely overcorrecting his power and torque.

[ThomasMartin]

Originally Posted by Moth

Subtract 12% and his dyno will be inline with everything else we've been seeing for the last few weeks. I do wish his numbers were uncorrected though. That dyno is most likely overcorrecting his power and torque.

Im going past there tomorrow ill ask if they can print me uncorrected numbers i also would like to compare to everyone else on the forum and by them correcting them you cant compare apples with peaches. But at least when i compare it to my last dyno there was a drastic increase and to me thats what matters...

[e.n335]

Originally Posted by ThomasMartin

Im going past there tomorrow ill ask if they can print me uncorrected numbers i also would like to compare to everyone else on the forum and by them correcting them you cant compare apples with peaches. But at least when i compare it to my last dyno there was a drastic increase and to me thats what matters...

The question is how much boost you are running now.

- Eugen

[Lane]

Looks that you were right. V1.47 had more power low down (at 2000rmp) even without the K&N and race gas. It would be interesting to see if you are able to get the same low down figures with V2 without the K&N and race fuel but by having the 100% settings instead. Or did you say before that 100% was not any better than 96%?

(P.S. The figures as such are seriously inflated as they should not be corrected, but it does not matter since we are interested in the difference)

[ThomasMartin]

Originally Posted by Lane

Looks that you were right. V1.47 had more power low down (at 2000rmp) even without the K&N and race gas. It would be interesting to see if you are able to get the same low down figures with V2 without the K&N and race fuel but by having the 100% settings instead. Or did you say before that 100% was not any better than 96%?

(P.S. The figures as such are seriously inflated as they should not be corrected, but it does not matter since we are interested in the difference)

Thats what i was saying without the air filter and high octane V2 would have less power than my V1.47 "at high altitude that is" and i agree the figures should be uncorrected and ill ask them if they can print new ones tomorrow.

Being at this high altitude 96% or 100% setting made no difference on my boost as the turbos where overspinning.

[dxb335d]

they WHP or crank?

[vbb]

Originally Posted by dxb335d

they WHP or crank?

No way it was at the wheels. 495 wheel ft. lbs of torque? Nah.