![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Mega dynoplaluza!
![]() |
![]() |
12-13-2007, 04:05 PM | #1 |
Banned
![]() 106
Rep 2,587
Posts |
Mega dynoplaluza!
Hey gang, got together with Driver72 today to do a few more runs. The dyno operator wasn't there so we got a bit dirty strapping in the cars, but it was a lot of fun.
Anyway this one chart gives people a good idea of what to expect from basic tunes. This isn't to say one tune is better or worse, or that you can't say raise the boost on tune Z to get better results. The cars are more or less equal and both have stock exhaust, aside from differences noted below. The bottom line was: Procede v1.47 / 92 octane (not shown on chart): 336/368 Procede v2.02 / 92 octane / 92% settings: 345/352 JB2H / catless downpipes / 91 octane: 347/374 JB2HR / catless downpipes / 97 octane: 377/419 and just for kicks: JB2HR / catless downpipes / 97 octane / no air filter: 383/422 FWIW my guess is if the v2.02 car ran @ 100% (~15psi vs 13psi shown above), on 97 octane, with downpipes, that it would wind up pretty close to the JB2HR tune above. It's all about boost and octane. |
|
12-13-2007, 04:15 PM | #4 |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 271
Rep 8,338
Posts |
^ i beg to differ, terry's being very civil here.
thanks for the info, they both like look good tunes.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 04:15 PM | #5 |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 271
Rep 8,338
Posts |
that i want to see.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 04:16 PM | #6 | |
Banned
![]() 106
Rep 2,587
Posts |
Quote:
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 04:24 PM | #8 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 64
Rep 1,677
Posts |
Good job Terry!
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 04:27 PM | #9 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 79
Rep 2,104
Posts |
I like
![]()
__________________
SaaS - The world of tomorrow is already here...www.saaschronicles.com |
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 04:42 PM | #14 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 55
Rep 1,714
Posts |
Quote:
Can you clarify? Do you mean that stock exhaust + DPs is 10hp down on a setup that consists of aftermarket exhaust + stock DPs? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 04:47 PM | #15 | |
Banned
![]() 106
Rep 2,587
Posts |
Quote:
I'm not sure what 1 octane point is worth, but I figure going from open exhaust / no cats / no resonator to factory mufflers / resonator / 2nd cats didn't cost me much power wise. Just a little midrange torque, and I have too much of that now as it is. A couple months ago I also did a dyno on factory downpipes, open exhaust, etc on the JB2R (not the H), on 96 octane, and did around 345/380, but that was on a dyno that is known to read 10rwhp less. So from what I can tell, the catless downpipes and H were worth 20rwhp and a ton of torque. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 04:47 PM | #16 | |
Banned
![]() 67
Rep 1,743
Posts |
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 04:53 PM | #19 |
Banned
![]() 106
Rep 2,587
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 05:08 PM | #21 |
![]() 1849
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2007, 05:10 PM | #22 |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 149
Rep 6,608
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|