[sflgator]

A thread directed toward Shiv...

Although I've been enjoying an error-free PROcede v2.02 (at 94% TQ Curve values) for a while now , I was just curious when the v2.1 map might be available?

I've heard that Shiv and the guys at Vishnu were working on making a bit more power (lower end perhaps? ) and a few extra goodies in the goody bag with v2.1.

Also, will there be more power with just the std. v2.1 map (w/ stock airbox, stock exhaust, and stock DPs) or only for those ppl with some/all of these other mods (stage 1, stage 2, etc.)?

[cn555ic]

Originally Posted by sflgator

A thread directed toward Shiv...

Although I've been enjoying an error-free PROcede v2.01 (at 94% TQ Curve values) for a while now , I was just curious when the v2.1 map might be available?

I've heard that Shiv and the guys at Vishnu were working on making a bit more power (lower end perhaps? ) and a few extra goodies in the goody bag with v2.1.

Yeah but I think the new map he is working on is setup for DP and exhaust....both that you and I don't have...

[Sniz]

if the new map proves to produce the numbers as advertised on dp's and exhaust and intake.....I know what I'm doing next!

[chris b.]

[cn555ic]

I am already working on a exhaust, but no one is currently making one that is from the catback for a E93

I am thinking of the CP-E exhaust, but have to modify the 2nd part of the connection to fit the crossbar that the E93 has....I just want something thats a bolt on, but I think i have to modify it

[tek818]

why aren't you running 2.0.2 ?

[cn555ic]

Originally Posted by AB Tek 818

why aren't you running 2.0.2 ?

He is running 2.02, but it was the first map out 2.01 maps... He is asking about V 2.10 !!!!

[sflgator]

Originally Posted by AB Tek 818

why aren't you running 2.0.2 ?

I am (v2.0.2 12-19-07 I think @ 94% across the board with ZERO problems); sorry...typo...edited. Thanks.

[Driver72]

I wouldn't expect much in the way of a power increase with v2.1 over v2.0.2 on a stock intake and stock DP car.

If anything there may be more torque delivered down low, but really, to make more than about 360 rwhp on these cars, you need at least a CAI or aftermarket DP's.

I think v2.1 will be more user friendly allowing (hopefully) user adjustable torque settings that are GEAR and RPM dependent, instead of just RPM dependent.

I know there is the talk of "launch control" and one or two have said, "this car already has launch control, it's called DSC"
But that statement is just false.
DSC is not launch control, but rather launch failure.
It doesn't cut just the right amount of power to allow perfect launches, it cuts power abrubtly and ruins launches.

Having control of DSC and the ability to (when accelerating hard in a straight line) interfere less, but still cut just enough power to keep the tires from spinning too much would be awesome.
Though admittedly I think that's a LOT to ask for.

[NPDAN]

Originally Posted by sflgator

A thread directed toward Shiv...

Although I've been enjoying an error-free PROcede v2.02 (at 94% TQ Curve values) for a while now , I was just curious when the v2.1 map might be available?

I've heard that Shiv and the guys at Vishnu were working on making a bit more power (lower end perhaps? ) and a few extra goodies in the goody bag with v2.1.

Also, will there be more power with just the std. v2.1 map (w/ stock airbox, stock exhaust, and stock DPs) or only for those ppl with some/all of these other mods (stage 1, stage 2, etc.)?

If those are the mods that it will take to get the most out of the newer map, than Im going to be forced to get the downpipes and vishnu's intake... I dont mind though...

[Lane]

Originally Posted by Driver72

If anything there may be more torque delivered down low, but really, to make more than about 360 rwhp on these cars, you need at least a CAI or aftermarket DP's.

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

(just exhaust)
with PROcede v2.0beta 376whp 406lbft

[Garrett]

Whats this thread about..?

[e90AW335i]

Originally Posted by Lane

Yeah. Just remember what everyone always said when "other" tuners posted high numbers with their personal car. Take it with a grain of salt. I haven't seen any numbers that impressive with just V2 and exhaust.

[sflgator]

Originally Posted by kyleh4852

Yeah. Just remember what everyone always said when "other" tuners posted high numbers with their personal car. Take it with a grain of salt. I haven't seen any numbers that impressive with just V2 and exhaust.

And I haven't seen any real impressive 1/4 mi. trap speeds with JB2 or JB2H cars either (other than the tuner's juiced up car). Plus, all the great ETs have been with DRs and/or running on race gas.

[e90AW335i]

Originally Posted by sflgator

And I haven't seen any real impressive 1/4 mi. trap speeds with JB2 or JB2H cars either (other than the tuner's juiced up car). Plus, all the great ETs have been with DRs and/or running on race gas.

Did I say you were supposed to? All I am saying is that people shouldn't be surprised when the tuner has the highest dyno numbers. That applies to track times as well.

You must be really insecure about something because you always get offensive about anything said about the PROcede. I wasn't even talking down on the product, and I was speaking about all tunes in general.

The PROcede is a great product, and has been having great results. Be happy with what you have, and don't get pissed any time I post something. Especially when it wasn't biased.

[sflgator]

Originally Posted by kyleh4852

Did I say you were supposed to? All I am saying is that people shouldn't be surprised when the tuner has the highest dyno numbers. That applies to track times as well.

You must be really insecure about something because you always get offensive about anything said about the PROcede. I wasn't even talking down on the product, and I was speaking about all tunes in general.

The PROcede is a great product, and has been having great results. Be happy with what you have, and don't get pissed any time I post something. Especially when it wasn't biased.

Sorry, I misunderstood your intention. No, not insecure about anything, and +1...I agree that typically the tuner shows the highest/best numbers...especially one who dynos and goes to the track very often. I am VERY HAPPY with PROcede v2...just looking forward to continual improvements.

[e90AW335i]

Originally Posted by sflgator

Sorry, I misunderstood your intention. No, not insecure about anything, and +1...I agree that typically the tuner shows the highest/best numbers...especially one who dynos and goes to the track very often. I am VERY HAPPY with PROcede v2...just looking forward to continual improvements.

Good, so no hard feelings?

It seems like every time time I post to something in response to you we get pissed at each other...

[sflgator]

Originally Posted by kyleh4852

Good, so no hard feelings?

It seems like every time time I post to something in response to you we get pissed at each other...

Nah, I'm not that sensitive; there's many other guys that piss me off much worse than you.

[e90AW335i]

Originally Posted by sflgator

there's many other guys that piss me off much worse than you.

+1 on that....

[Lane]

Originally Posted by sflgator

JB2 or JB2H

Why do you come to talk about JB in Procede forum and Procede thread?

[e90AW335i]

Originally Posted by Lane

Why do you come to talk about JB in Procede forum and Procede thread?

LOL....

He was trying to tell me that the same applies to other tuners. He wasn't saying anything else regarding JB. Re-read the thread....

[Serjames]

Originally Posted by cn555ic

I am already working on a exhaust, but no one is currently making one that is from the catback for a E93

I am thinking of the CP-E exhaust, but have to modify the 2nd part of the connection to fit the crossbar that the E93 has....I just want something thats a bolt on, but I think i have to modify it

errr, ok so dumb question the E93 is NOT the same as an e92 undercarriage then ?

Damn, so where's this crossbar on the car that prevents e92 catbacks from fitting ?

SJ