|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Around 8% HP gain on protune vs "notune" is that normal?
|
|
03-05-2016, 03:11 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
Around 8% HP gain on protune vs "notune" is that normal?
Hello everyone,
I have just gotten the right revision for my protune map and went out to the dyno. Car bone stock: 308 HP and 435 Nm Car with chargepipe, cobb dp's, AMS intercooler - no tune: 318 HP and 450 Nm Car with protune on 93 octane pump: 342 HP and 557 Nm Is that kind of a gain normal for N55, and what you would normally expect? The torque seems fine but I personally find the power to be lacking. All values are at the crank. Could anyone please shed any light onto this matter? Cheers, GreQonE |
03-05-2016, 06:37 PM | #3 |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2016, 07:44 PM | #4 |
Colonel
849
Rep 2,411
Posts |
Why do people say, torque is what I expected, but not power?
Torque makes power. Torque made at any given RPM is DIRECTLY proportional to power. Graphs look good. Strong midrange, and the small turbo running out of steam up top.
__________________
'02 S54 M3 (500/500 GC/Koni)
'08 N54 135 (JB4, DCI, BMW PS/Bilstein B6s, H&R M3 FSB, Strongflex FCABs) '14 N55 X1 (JB4, BMS DP, BMS Intake, Alpina TCU reflash, H&R Sports, Bilstein B6s, E93 M3 RSB, Strongflex FCABs, baby seat) '08 N54 535xi touring (Bilstein B6s, Downpipes, MHD tune, baby seat) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2016, 08:06 PM | #5 |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
I do understand the correlation betwen torque and power, however I can't understand why people get roughly the same TQ but much higher horsepower with similiar setups, and the difference is quite sizable.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2016, 11:34 AM | #8 |
Brigadier General
1189
Rep 3,228
Posts |
My thought process on this. Your stock of 308hp is around 280whp. Your protune of 342hp is probably 310-315whp. That is less than a JB4 map 2. Do you know if your gas is really bad or if you told them to be extremely conservative? I target 16psi when I run 93, which is closer to 340whp.
|
Appreciate
1
|
03-06-2016, 04:53 PM | #9 | |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
Quote:
I'm just astounded, my local tuners easiely squeze out around 360-380 HP at the crank on bone stock N55's and the protune barely makes 342? (On the same fuel I'm using, or very similiar one - where I'm located all fuels are basically the same) I'm still talking with the tuner for my protune but I somehow doubt that they will achieve what I want and I think I will need to go and get a local tuner involved. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2016, 06:12 PM | #10 | |
Brigadier General
1189
Rep 3,228
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2016, 06:22 PM | #12 |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
I have uploaded the logs on my server:
http://greqone.pl/datalog10.csv http://greqone.pl/datalog11.csv http://greqone.pl/datalog13.csv First two are runs on M3 from roughly 2500 rpm to redline, and the third one is from general cruising to illustrate the overal jerkiness, "hiccups" and other issues with the tune e.g. transmission overheat. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2016, 08:45 PM | #14 |
Colonel
325
Rep 2,016
Posts |
Get a catless dp, add meth and get a re-tune. You should be in the ball park that you're looking for.
__________________
WedgePerformance E40 MHD | Performance Exhaust Mod | BMS DP | Vibrant 1790 | BMS Intake | VRSF CP | xHP Stage 3 Michelin PSS | M3 Control Arms LUX v4 LEDs | Shadowline Grills | Lip Spoiler |
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2016, 06:09 AM | #15 |
Major
306
Rep 1,163
Posts |
How are you getting crank HP values? Was the engine removed and put on a water brake dyno?
Also, how much timing is being commanded? Timing, AFR and boost = engine power..... Timing differences can put you at 290hp or 390hp...... Just make sure you have enough knock resistance. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2016, 06:32 AM | #16 |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2016, 06:33 AM | #17 |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2016, 06:34 AM | #18 | |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
Quote:
For Timings, AFR I have uploaded the datalogs in previous post |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2016, 10:57 AM | #19 |
Brigadier General
1189
Rep 3,228
Posts |
Looking at your first 2 logs the power makes sense. You peak at 18 psi with negative timing and taper down to 9psi with 6 degrees timing. Also, the afr in the first log is very weird. It is too rich in the beginning half then ok in the second half. Peaking at 18psi is probably too high for 93 and 9psi is very conservative. So that explains the nice torque but poor HP. I can't really read the 3rd log on my phone, but the jerking may be from poor afr targets at partial throttle based on the first log. Overall I would say that is a pretty bad tune.
|
Appreciate
1
|
03-07-2016, 11:58 AM | #20 |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
Thank you for your input, I am waiting for ProTuning Freaks to send me next revision of this map, but I think I will also use the services of one of local tuners out here for a comparison.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2016, 05:07 PM | #21 |
Private First Class
36
Rep 166
Posts |
I have received a refund from ProTuning Freaks due to their tuner being on sick leave.
I am going to go with a local tuner, will update you with results once done |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|