![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Bpc turbo kit?
![]() |
![]() |
06-13-2016, 06:08 PM | #2 |
New Member
5
Rep 19
Posts
Drives: Black '09 E93 328i w/n51
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Somewhere between Indiana and NY
|
Were probably not left out, our engines are basically the same except our N51s have a lower compression ration and will probably take boost even better than the n52s.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 06:14 PM | #3 | |
Custom User Title
![]() 417
Rep 1,337
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2016, 06:55 PM | #4 | ||
Major
![]() 417
Rep 1,286
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2012 Jet Black 328i Coupe / ESS Tuning Gen. 2 Supercharger / Evolution Racewerks Oil Cooler / BMS Oil Catch Can / BMW Performance Exhaust with Dinan Y Pipe / Eibach Pro Kit Springs / Koni FSD Shocks / MFactory LSD & Differential Bushings / Performance Rear Trailing Arms / BMW Performance Strut Brace / Stop Tech Slotted Rotors / Hawk HPS 5.0 / SS Brake Lines / Brass Guide Pins / M3 Front Control Arms, 28 MM FSB, Engine Cowl, and DCT Paddle Shifters / Michelin PSS / APEX ARC-8
|
||
Appreciate
1
|
06-14-2016, 07:31 AM | #5 | ||
Colonel
![]() 153
Rep 2,120
Posts |
Quote:
Then again I love people with the time and balls fabricate and tune a new turbo setup. Happy tuning all
__________________
BMW CCA # 473001
|
||
Appreciate
1
|
06-15-2016, 05:55 PM | #6 |
New Member
5
Rep 19
Posts
Drives: Black '09 E93 328i w/n51
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Somewhere between Indiana and NY
|
Personally, I'm completely happy with what my car is. Just stating that the n51 probably won't be left out. When I feel like going fast, thats what my 20 year old AMG is for.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-15-2016, 06:16 PM | #7 | ||
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 103
Rep 385
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
Appreciate
3
|
06-16-2016, 04:38 PM | #9 |
Slow.
3808
Rep 7,150
Posts
Drives: N54 6466 100% E85 + Meth
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
This.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-16-2016, 04:38 PM | #10 | |
Slow.
3808
Rep 7,150
Posts
Drives: N54 6466 100% E85 + Meth
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
Quote:
Not to mention it is highly unlikely the engine will handle boost half as well as the N54.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-16-2016, 08:44 PM | #11 |
![]() 871
Rep 642
Posts |
Just a show of hands, whos making over 400rwhp - 450rwhp (running less than 22psi) on 93 pump gas with out a turbo(s) upgrade or additional fuel system with out running meth or a single turbo with a piggy back and having to run a "backend flash" on a n54? BC this can be done with a turbo kit on a stock NA engine and not have to worry about finding e85 or filling up a meth tank or having to piggy back on top of a fuel system and on a tune setup.
Last edited by Bob@BPC; 06-16-2016 at 09:06 PM.. |
Appreciate
18
|
06-17-2016, 06:08 AM | #12 | |
Slow.
3808
Rep 7,150
Posts
Drives: N54 6466 100% E85 + Meth
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
Quote:
On top of that the n54 is built for boost. Hence why you see 600 and 700 whp on the stock block.
__________________
Last edited by Torgus; 06-17-2016 at 06:20 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2016, 10:19 AM | #14 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 183
Rep 657
Posts |
I will say I am really interested to see how far these guys can push this car!
I am not interested in a turbo version of my car but and interested in seeing someone else doing it. Go BPC! |
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2016, 11:20 AM | #15 |
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 39
Rep 344
Posts |
I don't understand what's the deal with the 335 owners.
![]() they keep posting on a 328 treads but is always negative comments. Maybe there are some 328i owners posting negative comments on the 335 treads. ![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2016, 11:43 AM | #16 |
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 103
Rep 385
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2016, 11:59 AM | #17 | |
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 103
Rep 385
Posts |
Quote:
![]() Engine/Drivetrain Modifications: - Quaife LSD - Spec stage 3+ clutch - Spec single mass steel flywheel - AquaMist HS4 Meth injection w/ Howerton TwinTank & dual .8 jets. - MMP Inlet kit - UUC SSK with DSSR - 4 Bar TMAP sensor - Helix front mount intercooler - CPe charge pipe w/ Tial bov - CPe catless 3 inch downpipes - BMS oil catch can - AR design stage 1 oil cooler - Cobb AP - Bren tune(switching to motiv) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2016, 12:00 PM | #18 | ||
Slow.
3808
Rep 7,150
Posts
Drives: N54 6466 100% E85 + Meth
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
Quote:
I agreed that had the n54 & n55 never been produced, turbocharging the N51/2 engines would make perfect sense, we also would of had it before now. I mean go for it but you have to understand what you are getting: The n54 can sit at 450/500 all day long as it was built for boost. Is the NA engine going to handle double the hp & tq well as it was never designed for FI is a question to ask. At the end of the day you will be paying $$$ to only get to where a N54 is 100% stock with a tune on E85 also at the end of the day the N54 engine is the better building block for hp via FI. If you want to go FI there is an engine designed for FI from the factory for your chassis. This is my point that I was trying to get across. Turbo charger the heck out of your N51/2 and enjoy. Quote:
Here is one 424 whp / 503 wtq stock turbos pump 93 octane gas
__________________
Last edited by Torgus; 06-17-2016 at 12:17 PM.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2016, 12:12 PM | #19 | |
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 103
Rep 385
Posts |
Bro it's very much implied from your statements but it's all good though, we're all enthusiasts here.
Quote:
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2016, 01:06 PM | #20 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 83
Rep 525
Posts |
the difference is that a N52 turbo has a much better chance of keeping it's peak power for further in the rev range, than the n54/55 (with less torque down low as a trade off obviously)
I know you can change the turbo's on the N54 and make good power up top, but that's far from a few bolt-ons/tune... Personally I was a non believer, but if a kit comes out that makes more than 400whp between 4000/4500 to 7000rpm for reasonable price and we see no reliability issues either, than sorry but would rather get that than an n54, unless as mentioned the turbos are upgraded on the n54 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2016, 01:10 PM | #21 |
Lieutenant
![]() 68
Rep 393
Posts
Drives: 2015 M3
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles
|
definitely interested in seeing how this pans out with BPC, was just getting around to the ESS SC but glad to see other options out there.
N51 guy btw
__________________
Harry I.
Los Angeles 2011 AW 328i 2015 AW F80 M3 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2016, 01:18 PM | #22 |
![]() 871
Rep 642
Posts |
I can tell you this, we have had over 100 n54 cars hit the rollers here and I can tell you from what I have seen (SAE numbers or uncorrected) the 93 pump cars have yet to break 400rwhp. We built a rb turbo car not to long ago, on 15lbs of boost it made 420rwhp SAE on 93 through an auto. What we are trying to do is fill a void in the market for the N52 (which BTW has a FAR superior head design over the N54,S55, and so on) build something THEY WANT and not you, the n54 owner.
One last note, for those who want a cheap forged bottom end, the N52 head might swap onto the N54 short block ![]() |
Appreciate
4
_Ryan_62.50 brkeley128i4.50 |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|