E90Post
 


 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > Stock Airbox with a BMS Drop-in vs an Open Airbox



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-27-2016, 03:26 AM   #1
WedgePerformance
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
WedgePerformance's Avatar
United_States
1342
Rep
1,701
Posts

Drives: Slot Machines.. Keep Taking $
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Portland, OR

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Stock Airbox with a BMS Drop-in vs an Open Airbox

Have you ever wondered how much power you can I make before upgrading your stock airbox to a MR5 or one of the countless options we have today?

I was actually shocked at the results today... 430.84 vs 416.01 whp

Click Here - Datazap.me

Almost 15 WHP gained by just removing the top of the stock airbox. Because I didn't have other filters with me to test, I can only conclude two possibilities. 1. The BMS Drop-in Filter is restrictive... Or 2. the cold air snorkel is too restrictive without positive pressure from air flow while driving.

The car: Stock '08 Sport E92 AT Stock FMIC, Stock DPs, and 132,000 miles. Mods: Fuel-IT Stage 2 LPFP, ER Charge Pipe with Tial BOV, BMS Drop-In Cloth Filter, and MFactory LSD. Car was walnut blasted within the past 500 miles and has new index 12 injectors.

Car was running a high % of E85 today and it was HOT. Was 102 deg F in the shop today.

Edit: I want Dimitri ******** to chime in here also as he's done a lot of testing with regard to AFE Cold Air Intake and now ECS Tuning's really cool DCI CF Cold Air Intake box. He might have some supporting numbers also he can throw down.


Last edited by WedgePerformance; 08-27-2016 at 07:30 PM..
Appreciate 2
Shane303121.50
JASE33526.00
      08-27-2016, 04:49 AM   #2
Julian2485
Major
113
Rep
1,340
Posts

Drives: Black lci e90 335 xdrive
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New york

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by WedgePerformance
Have you ever wondered how much power you can I make before upgrading your stock airbox to a MR5 or one of the countless options we have today?

I was actually shocked at the results today... 430.84 vs 416.01 whp

Click Here - Datazap.me

Almost 15 WHP gained by just removing the top of the stock airbox. Because I didn't have other filters with me to test, I can only conclude two possibilities. 1. The BMS Drop-in Filter is restrictive... Or 2. the cold air snorkel is too restrictive without positive pressure from air flow while driving.

The car: Stock '08 Sport E92 AT Stock FMIC, Stock DPs, and 132,000 miles. Mods: Fuel-IT Stage 2 LPFP, ER Charge Pipe with Tial BOV, BMS Drop-In Cloth Filter, and MFactory LSD. Car was walnut blasted within the past 500 miles and has new index 12 injectors.

Car was running a high % of E85 today and it was HOT. Was 102 deg F in the shop today.

[IMG]http://i1198.photobucket.com/albums/...psybkmtsbf.jpg[/IMG]
And here I am with the kn drop in filter fbo with inlets. So I guess I could try taking off the air box cover and seeing if I feel a difference huh. Good work though and let us know when you find out which one is the restriction
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2016, 07:03 AM   #3
RSL
Captain
650
Rep
779
Posts

Drives: E92 ///M3 (Retired) / 335is
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (6)

If all you did was open the lid and used the same filter, pretty clear it's the snorkel with no incoming air and/or the airbox design itself.

After I added hybrids, I got to wondering if the closed AFE SI single filter/snorkel was too restrictive. I bought DCI and tested the AFE closed (fully sealed), lid off and the DCI back to back. That was on the street with the snorkel functioning (with scoops) and, other than IAT differences between closed and open/DCI by the end of the gear, they were all pretty close on logs and VD. Yours are miles apart by comparison.

Why did your IATs suddenly drop 12F before towards the end of the run before you let off?
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2016, 08:32 AM   #4
Sgop335
Colonel
Sgop335's Avatar
United_States
669
Rep
2,080
Posts

Drives: 07 335i e92, 08 535i
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: MD

iTrader: (1)

If you take the top off, thats unfiltered air going in?

The stock box needs more volume above the filter to be less restrictive.
__________________
335i e92 TPC 19Ts
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2016, 09:18 AM   #5
TrollToll
Banned
TrollToll's Avatar
656
Rep
946
Posts

Drives: 535i
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RSL View Post
If all you did was open the lid and used the same filter, pretty clear it's the snorkel with no incoming air and/or the airbox design itself.
Have you ever looked inside the box? The filter is irrelevant when the lid is removed.
Appreciate 1
      08-27-2016, 10:30 AM   #6
Julian2485
Major
113
Rep
1,340
Posts

Drives: Black lci e90 335 xdrive
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New york

iTrader: (1)

So top off is like stock box without a filter inside of it ?
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2016, 11:02 AM   #7
RCOLEMAN545
Liberty or Death
RCOLEMAN545's Avatar
United_States
60
Rep
90
Posts

Drives: 2007 E92 335i
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: South Carolina

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian2485 View Post
So top off is like stock box without a filter inside of it ?
The filter is still inside of the airbox, the lid is just removed.
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2016, 11:08 AM   #8
DailyN54
Private First Class
79
Rep
154
Posts

Drives: 08 335xi, 08 335i
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (0)

I want to see stock air box vs cone filters.
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2016, 11:09 AM   #9
TrollToll
Banned
TrollToll's Avatar
656
Rep
946
Posts

Drives: 535i
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCOLEMAN545 View Post
The filter is still inside of the airbox, the lid is just removed.
Again, the filter is irrelevant with the lid removed. Please, just go open your box and look.
Appreciate 1
      08-27-2016, 11:14 AM   #10
terryd5150
Head Fry Cook at McBurgertown
United_States
503
Rep
1,005
Posts

Drives: 2015 435i M-Sport 6MT
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Greenville, SC

iTrader: (9)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yournamehere90 View Post
Again, the filter is irrelevant with the lid removed. Please, just go open your box and look.
If you're running a stock-type filter, the comment above is 100% correct.
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2016, 11:59 AM   #11
Sgop335
Colonel
Sgop335's Avatar
United_States
669
Rep
2,080
Posts

Drives: 07 335i e92, 08 535i
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: MD

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCOLEMAN545 View Post
The filter is still inside of the airbox, the lid is just removed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian2485 View Post
So top off is like stock box without a filter inside of it ?


See the big gaping hole , intake to the turbos. Doesnt matter filter or not.
Attached Images
 
__________________
335i e92 TPC 19Ts
Appreciate 5
      08-27-2016, 02:01 PM   #12
NA55
Second Lieutenant
32
Rep
269
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: LA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RSL View Post
If all you did was open the lid and used the same filter, pretty clear it's the snorkel with no incoming air and/or the airbox design itself.

After I added hybrids, I got to wondering if the closed AFE SI single filter/snorkel was too restrictive. I bought DCI and tested the AFE closed (fully sealed), lid off and the DCI back to back. That was on the street with the snorkel functioning (with scoops) and, other than IAT differences between closed and open/DCI by the end of the gear, they were all pretty close on logs and VD. Yours are miles apart by comparison.

Why did your IATs suddenly drop 12F before towards the end of the run before you let off?
Do you have vdyno comparison of the two intakes?
I did a similar test with a stock airbox with the bottom cutout for airflow (w/ k&n) and saw significant gains with the DCI setup past 5500 rpm..
Appreciate 1
      08-27-2016, 03:32 PM   #13
RSL
Captain
650
Rep
779
Posts

Drives: E92 ///M3 (Retired) / 335is
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yournamehere90 View Post
Have you ever looked inside the box? The filter is irrelevant when the lid is removed.
Yeah, once, years ago when I was pulling it out to replace it. I forgot the inlets were essentially open to atmosphere with the lid off, was thinking they sat under the filter.

The filter probably isn't helping then, but still leaning towards the snorkel not functioning as being the larger issue since I noticed little difference on my tests with conical filter and open/closed box at speed. Maybe the AFE SI setup is just that much better than stock, but that's with inlets and hybrids at 19psi, so it would have to be significantly better.

Quick way for him to find out what's up would be to repeat the tests on a street log and see if that difference is still there (if brave enough to run unfiltered on the street with the snorkel connected). Closed box with filter, closed box no filter, open box tests would tell whether the box or the filter is an issue and how much from each, if any.

Edit: I guess the lid wouldn't seal without the filter in place though, would have to cut a filter up or create a separate seal.
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2016, 03:45 PM   #14
spxxx
Boost
spxxx's Avatar
1376
Rep
3,704
Posts

Drives: 135i M-Sport
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Valley of Silicon, CA - United States

iTrader: (9)

Wait... Running engine straight from atmosphere without any filter is less restrictive? Damn wish I had known

Gonna be a lot of bees getting pulverized in the intake fins of the turbo with that kind of setup on the street.
__________________
F80 M3 TrackBoi, Z4MC GarageBoi, 1M Clone StreetBoi
Appreciate 1
      08-27-2016, 06:10 PM   #15
TrollToll
Banned
TrollToll's Avatar
656
Rep
946
Posts

Drives: 535i
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by spxxx View Post
Wait... Running engine straight from atmosphere without any filter is less restrictive? Damn wish I had known

Gonna be a lot of bees getting pulverized in the intake fins of the turbo with that kind of setup on the street.
The benefits are even better in dusty or rainy environments. The abrasive dust particles do a great job of polishing the intake valves and the fine water mist during rain helps cool the turbos.
Appreciate 3
      08-28-2016, 07:48 AM   #16
DR-JEKL
Major General
Australia
909
Rep
6,285
Posts

Drives: Space Grey E92 335i 6MT
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Newcastle Ozstraylia

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yournamehere90 View Post
The benefits are even better in dusty or rainy environments. The abrasive dust particles do a great job of polishing the intake valves and the fine water mist during rain helps cool the turbos.
hmm no more carbon buildup walnut blasts required!

Genius!!!
Appreciate 0
      08-28-2016, 12:57 PM   #17
terryd5150
Head Fry Cook at McBurgertown
United_States
503
Rep
1,005
Posts

Drives: 2015 435i M-Sport 6MT
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Greenville, SC

iTrader: (9)

Back on Topic.

WedgePerformance

Interesting results, particularly considering stock FMIC & DPs.

I've seen the previous threads on stock air box/Mr. 5/DCI; however, I'd be extremely interested to see someone replicate similar test with inlets (or inlets & outlets both).

It'd be nice to see actual results using current technology.

I suspect inlets could make a clean Mr. 5 install (or maybe even Dinan) a more viable performance option.

Last edited by terryd5150; 08-28-2016 at 06:30 PM..
Appreciate 1
      08-28-2016, 10:30 PM   #18
BQTuning
Banned
United_States
475
Rep
4,392
Posts

Drives: 2012 Z4 sDrive35i M Sport 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: bq@bqtuning.com

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by WedgePerformance View Post

Edit: I want Dimitri ******** to chime in here also as he's done a lot of testing with regard to AFE Cold Air Intake and now ECS Tuning's really cool DCI CF Cold Air Intake box. He might have some supporting numbers also he can throw down.
The factory intake box itself restricts airflow "vacuum" before the down flow to the inlets. The factory setup sucks air in through the snorkel from the front of the car then it has to travel UP through the filter and over a "restricted space" between the filter and the cover that is about a half inch gap for air to be sucked through is like trying to breath through a coffee straw.

Removing the cover bypasses all of this, so everyone would think ok time for a DCI.

So I decided to seal up an aFe Stage 2 Elite CAI, which is now superseded by the aFe Magnum GT (100% sealed), that has better airflow, and I ran before and after dyno results. I gained 13 whp and 17 wtq more over the factory box with a K&N drop in filter. To make it even more interesting I went back to the dyno with unfavorable weather conditions




Stock Turbos like colder air.
Appreciate 2
      08-28-2016, 10:52 PM   #19
Julian2485
Major
113
Rep
1,340
Posts

Drives: Black lci e90 335 xdrive
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New york

iTrader: (1)

Someone please make a Ecstuning intake but for a third of the price lol. Dcis within a airbox pleeeeeease lol
Appreciate 0
      08-29-2016, 10:04 PM   #20
NA55
Second Lieutenant
32
Rep
269
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: LA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by WedgePerformance View Post
Almost 15 WHP gained by just removing the top of the stock airbox. Because I didn't have other filters with me to test, I can only conclude two possibilities. 1. The BMS Drop-in Filter is restrictive... Or 2. the cold air snorkel is too restrictive without positive pressure from air flow while driving.
I'm going to say it's number 2. The opening at the snorkel is way to restrictive.. I use a modified stock airbox (large cut at bottom) and k&n drop in and dyno'd 442 whp which was comparable to others who were running DCIs that same day..
Appreciate 0
      08-29-2016, 10:25 PM   #21
Julian2485
Major
113
Rep
1,340
Posts

Drives: Black lci e90 335 xdrive
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New york

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NA55
Quote:
Originally Posted by WedgePerformance View Post
Almost 15 WHP gained by just removing the top of the stock airbox. Because I didn't have other filters with me to test, I can only conclude two possibilities. 1. The BMS Drop-in Filter is restrictive... Or 2. the cold air snorkel is too restrictive without positive pressure from air flow while driving.
I'm going to say it's number 2. The opening at the snorkel is way to restrictive.. I use a modified stock airbox (large cut at bottom) and k&n drop in and dyno'd 442 whp which was comparable to others who were running DCIs that same day..
So stock airbox is fine ? We pretty much need an upgraded air snorkel. Isn't the z4 snorkel bigger ? Do you think we could use that ? Do you have pics of your modified airbox for us to see ?
Appreciate 0
      08-29-2016, 10:47 PM   #22
NA55
Second Lieutenant
32
Rep
269
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: LA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian2485 View Post
So stock airbox is fine ? We pretty much need an upgraded air snorkel. Isn't the z4 snorkel bigger ? Do you think we could use that ? Do you have pics of your modified airbox for us to see ?
Here's the modified airbox..

Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST