E90Post
 


 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > Can Piggybacks alter the MPG calculations?



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-15-2008, 04:47 PM   #1
getInline
Lieutenant
getInline's Avatar
Canada
13
Rep
412
Posts

Drives: 2008 335 Coupe, c32 AMG
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Parts Unknown

iTrader: (1)

Can Piggybacks alter the MPG calculations?

Just curious? Since some piggybacks can (or soon will) intercept fuel pressure and duty cycle signals, can the ECU be tricked into thinking you are getting better mileage than your are or does it use some other flow meter for this calculation.

Now before anyone derails this thread into an A versus B:
- This isn't a big deal to me, I just have a technical curiosity.
- I'm not pitting one system against another, it's just curiosity (did I say that already?)

Clarification: I'm not talking about the 'actual' fuel economy of the car, but rather the calculated mileage that is displayed by the ECU. In other words can the calculated fuel economy numbers be wrong if fuel pressure and duty cycle signals are being intercepted?

Last edited by getInline; 07-15-2008 at 05:00 PM.. Reason: Clarification
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 04:50 PM   #2
darkphantom
Banned
631
Rep
5,945
Posts

Drives: E93 335i
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The place for Bimmers

iTrader: (4)

well some owners of the sstt have said that it gives them +3 MPG - I have yet to see that, will let you know after a week of use.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 04:52 PM   #3
getInline
Lieutenant
getInline's Avatar
Canada
13
Rep
412
Posts

Drives: 2008 335 Coupe, c32 AMG
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Parts Unknown

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkphantom View Post
well some owners of the sstt have said that it gives them +3 MPG - I have yet to see that, will let you know after a week of use.
Yes but are they really getting +3 MPG or is it just the computer that is reporting better fuel economy because the signals it uses to calculate mileage are being altered (offset). That is my basic question.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 05:01 PM   #4
continentalg5
Major
continentalg5's Avatar
United_States
17
Rep
1,074
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

I believe that with the new JB3 that is coming out, you can switch to a map that makes it like a 328, which would in turn provide better fuel economy.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 05:23 PM   #5
getInline
Lieutenant
getInline's Avatar
Canada
13
Rep
412
Posts

Drives: 2008 335 Coupe, c32 AMG
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Parts Unknown

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by continentalg5 View Post
I believe that with the new JB3 that is coming out, you can switch to a map that makes it like a 328, which would in turn provide better fuel economy.
Yes I know but you're missing a critical subtlety....I'm not talking about the real fuel economy, I'm talking about the value that gets displayed in the dash. That value may or may not reflect reality. In other words is the mileage value displayed by the computer CORRECT or is it INCORRECT if a piggyback is being used.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 05:34 PM   #6
Choolgooz
Lieutenant
Choolgooz's Avatar
8
Rep
450
Posts

Drives: 08 335i coupe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (3)

i know what ur trying to say but i dont have an answer, best way is to calculate is the old fashion way after you fill up. I just got my SSTT installed like 20 min ago, i am gonna give it a week before i take any measurements. I dont think there will be a big difference w/ the TT, since it dont mess with the fuel calculations all that much.. or maybe i am wrong.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 06:45 PM   #7
rideelement247
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
61
Rep
1,677
Posts

Drives: 08 335i, 67 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Florida

iTrader: (2)

With v2 I read 16.8 MPG...I figure I am getting less than that as I am always effin filling up . I want to say I am getting closer to 14 MPG but I haven't done any research to prove this.
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 06:47 PM   #8
e90AW335i
Major General
United_States
144
Rep
6,608
Posts

Drives: e90 335i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ......

iTrader: (4)

I have recalculated mine over and over again and it is always very close.
__________________
I install all tunes, intakes, o2 simms, and most cosmetic mods. PM me for a quote.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 06:52 PM   #9
Mr. 5
Modder Raider
Mr. 5's Avatar
Scotland
802
Rep
8,633
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB

iTrader: (31)

Garage List
2007 e90 335i  [8.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by e90AW335i View Post
I have recalculated mine over and over again and it is always very close.
Me too.
I get absolutely great MPG on the freeway (29) and horrible on the city streets (16).
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD

Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 07:01 PM   #10
Malek@MRF
Brigadier General
Malek@MRF's Avatar
United_States
740
Rep
3,732
Posts

Drives: E92 M3, E46 M3, G82 M4
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Irvine, California

iTrader: (5)

my gauge reads 20.9 with my BlackBox. It hasn't been reset for the last 3 fillups and majority of my driving is in the city. Doesn't see the freeway much. On average I get around 319 miles per fill-up.

The SSTT does not yeild a 3 MPG improvement over stock.
__________________
BMW PERFORMANCE SPECIALISTS. Race Engines. Suspension. F/I. Brakes. Race Preparation. Factory Service. Alignments.
OFFICIAL PARTNERS: KW. MOTON. Brembo. AP Racing. BBS Motorsport. iND. HRE. Turner Motorsport. VAC. BMW Motorsport.

Facebook | Instagram | Yelp! | Flikr
Phone: 949-233-0448 | E-Mail: info@mrfengineering.com
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 07:11 PM   #11
jadeddjay
Major
jadeddjay's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
1,441
Posts

Drives: e92 335i, f10 m5 comp
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: jackson, ms

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2007 e92 335i  [0.00]
i have v2 and its pretty accurate. i reset the odo every time i refuel.

my rule of thumb is that if i can squeeze out about 100 miles per 1/4 tank, thats about 22-23mpg i think.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 07:14 PM   #12
rideelement247
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
61
Rep
1,677
Posts

Drives: 08 335i, 67 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Florida

iTrader: (2)

I get about 320 miles on a full tank . Ticker shoots to 360 but then goes to 310 - 320 after adapting to the shitting driving conditions here in South Florida .
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 07:16 PM   #13
itsbrokeagain
itsbrokeagain's Avatar
United_States
311
Rep
15,745
Posts

Drives: 1999 528iT, E53 X5, E46 325xi
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Strong Island

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. 5 View Post
Me too.
I get absolutely great MPG on the freeway (29) and horrible on the city streets (16).
Stock I get 30-32 (29 with the A/C on) and horrible as well around town...16 at the very best..usually 12.


I get around 340 on a tank to and from work.

My best ever was 514 and 502 miles on one tank of gas. And that was sucking it dry with 5 miles left to go on the tank.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 08:27 PM   #14
getInline
Lieutenant
getInline's Avatar
Canada
13
Rep
412
Posts

Drives: 2008 335 Coupe, c32 AMG
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Parts Unknown

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by e90AW335i View Post
I have recalculated mine over and over again and it is always very close.
Interesting, if the ECU calculated mileage is close to reality then the ECU must be calculating the mileage based on fuel flow rates from a fuel flow sensor rather than calculating them based on duty cycle and fuel pressure. A seperate flow sensor would be the right way to do it since it would be more accurate.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 08:30 PM   #15
RRGOO7
Colonel
RRGOO7's Avatar
377
Rep
2,451
Posts

Drives: GTR
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Miami FL

iTrader: (13)

How the hell are you getting 300+ out of a tank! My average is stating 17mpg...i usually get about 240-260 miles out of one tank....mostly city driving.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 08:50 PM   #16
jcarlucci1
Lieutenant Colonel
70
Rep
1,642
Posts

Drives: Jet Black 335i
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa

iTrader: (10)

Am I the only one who gets 12-13 mpg..stock?
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 08:52 PM   #17
e90AW335i
Major General
United_States
144
Rep
6,608
Posts

Drives: e90 335i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ......

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcarlucci1 View Post
Am I the only one who gets 12-13 mpg..stock?
Yes. I am pushing ~370rwhp and I get 20-22mpg with mixed driving....
__________________
I install all tunes, intakes, o2 simms, and most cosmetic mods. PM me for a quote.
Appreciate 0
      07-15-2008, 11:30 PM   #18
hotrod182
.
hotrod182's Avatar
878
Rep
3,994
Posts

Drives: 2023 i4 M50
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcarlucci1 View Post
Am I the only one who gets 12-13 mpg..stock?
I'm at 13.6 right now.
Piggybacks that alter fuel pressure will most likely throw off the accuracy of the MPG reading in the car. It will read higher than your are actually getting.
__________________
2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph
2019 i3s Terra,
2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph
2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds
2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy)
Appreciate 0
      07-16-2008, 09:48 AM   #19
scalbert
Major General
scalbert's Avatar
158
Rep
5,776
Posts

Drives: '13 S4, '15 Q7
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Woodstock, GA

iTrader: (8)

Quote:
Originally Posted by getInline View Post
Just curious? Since some piggybacks can (or soon will) intercept fuel pressure and duty cycle signals, can the ECU be tricked into thinking you are getting better mileage than your are or does it use some other flow meter for this calculation.

Now before anyone derails this thread into an A versus B:
- This isn't a big deal to me, I just have a technical curiosity.
- I'm not pitting one system against another, it's just curiosity (did I say that already?)

Clarification: I'm not talking about the 'actual' fuel economy of the car, but rather the calculated mileage that is displayed by the ECU. In other words can the calculated fuel economy numbers be wrong if fuel pressure and duty cycle signals are being intercepted?
Yes and no. With O2 sensor attentuation the DME is still controlling pulse width so MPG calculations would be accurate. The caveat now is with fuel pressure signal alterations. If you trick the DME into thinking the pressure is lower than it really is, the MPG calculations are off; MPG calculations would be higher than they really are.

That said, this only occurs under heavy load and has a minimal impact. An off the hip guess would equate to less than 0.5 MPG if even that high; it may be as little as a tenth.
Appreciate 0
      07-16-2008, 11:25 AM   #20
getInline
Lieutenant
getInline's Avatar
Canada
13
Rep
412
Posts

Drives: 2008 335 Coupe, c32 AMG
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Parts Unknown

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by scalbert View Post
Yes and no. With O2 sensor attentuation the DME is still controlling pulse width so MPG calculations would be accurate. The caveat now is with fuel pressure signal alterations. If you trick the DME into thinking the pressure is lower than it really is, the MPG calculations are off; MPG calculations would be higher than they really are.

That said, this only occurs under heavy load and has a minimal impact. An off the hip guess would equate to less than 0.5 MPG if even that high; it may be as little as a tenth.
Thank You Scalbert! That's exactly what I was wondering. I understand that it's only something you would see under load so it's probably only something you would notice on a track day. Curiosity satisfied!
Appreciate 0
      07-16-2008, 11:40 AM   #21
getInline
Lieutenant
getInline's Avatar
Canada
13
Rep
412
Posts

Drives: 2008 335 Coupe, c32 AMG
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Parts Unknown

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod182 View Post
I'm at 13.6 right now.
Piggybacks that alter fuel pressure will most likely throw off the accuracy of the MPG reading in the car. It will read higher than your are actually getting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcarlucci1 View Post
Am I the only one who gets 12-13 mpg..stock?

Wow, you two either win the leadfoot award or the congested city traffic award.

For my city commute I get 19 if the traffic is good and I really baby it or 14-15 if traffic is bad or I'm on it. Downtown I'd probably drop into the 12-13 range. It really all depends on how much stop and go traffic you have.

Thanks for the fuel pressure info HotRod, that's what I was wondering.
Appreciate 0
      07-16-2008, 03:15 PM   #22
jcarlucci1
Lieutenant Colonel
70
Rep
1,642
Posts

Drives: Jet Black 335i
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa

iTrader: (10)

Quote:
Originally Posted by getInline View Post
Wow, you two either win the leadfoot award or the congested city traffic award.

For my city commute I get 19 if the traffic is good and I really baby it or 14-15 if traffic is bad or I'm on it. Downtown I'd probably drop into the 12-13 range. It really all depends on how much stop and go traffic you have.

Thanks for the fuel pressure info HotRod, that's what I was wondering.
At 13-14mpg I am taking it really easy..just constant stop and go I guess
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST