|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Can Piggybacks alter the MPG calculations?
|
|
07-15-2008, 04:47 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant
13
Rep 412
Posts |
Can Piggybacks alter the MPG calculations?
Just curious? Since some piggybacks can (or soon will) intercept fuel pressure and duty cycle signals, can the ECU be tricked into thinking you are getting better mileage than your are or does it use some other flow meter for this calculation.
Now before anyone derails this thread into an A versus B: - This isn't a big deal to me, I just have a technical curiosity. - I'm not pitting one system against another, it's just curiosity (did I say that already?) Clarification: I'm not talking about the 'actual' fuel economy of the car, but rather the calculated mileage that is displayed by the ECU. In other words can the calculated fuel economy numbers be wrong if fuel pressure and duty cycle signals are being intercepted? Last edited by getInline; 07-15-2008 at 05:00 PM.. Reason: Clarification |
07-15-2008, 04:52 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant
13
Rep 412
Posts |
Yes but are they really getting +3 MPG or is it just the computer that is reporting better fuel economy because the signals it uses to calculate mileage are being altered (offset). That is my basic question.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 05:23 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant
13
Rep 412
Posts |
Yes I know but you're missing a critical subtlety....I'm not talking about the real fuel economy, I'm talking about the value that gets displayed in the dash. That value may or may not reflect reality. In other words is the mileage value displayed by the computer CORRECT or is it INCORRECT if a piggyback is being used.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 05:34 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
8
Rep 450
Posts |
i know what ur trying to say but i dont have an answer, best way is to calculate is the old fashion way after you fill up. I just got my SSTT installed like 20 min ago, i am gonna give it a week before i take any measurements. I dont think there will be a big difference w/ the TT, since it dont mess with the fuel calculations all that much.. or maybe i am wrong.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 06:45 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant Colonel
61
Rep 1,677
Posts |
With v2 I read 16.8 MPG...I figure I am getting less than that as I am always effin filling up . I want to say I am getting closer to 14 MPG but I haven't done any research to prove this.
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 06:47 PM | #8 |
Major General
144
Rep 6,608
Posts |
I have recalculated mine over and over again and it is always very close.
__________________
I install all tunes, intakes, o2 simms, and most cosmetic mods. PM me for a quote. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 06:52 PM | #9 | |
Modder Raider
802
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
I get absolutely great MPG on the freeway (29) and horrible on the city streets (16).
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 07:01 PM | #10 |
Brigadier General
740
Rep 3,732
Posts |
my gauge reads 20.9 with my BlackBox. It hasn't been reset for the last 3 fillups and majority of my driving is in the city. Doesn't see the freeway much. On average I get around 319 miles per fill-up.
The SSTT does not yeild a 3 MPG improvement over stock.
__________________
BMW PERFORMANCE SPECIALISTS. Race Engines. Suspension. F/I. Brakes. Race Preparation. Factory Service. Alignments.
OFFICIAL PARTNERS: KW. MOTON. Brembo. AP Racing. BBS Motorsport. iND. HRE. Turner Motorsport. VAC. BMW Motorsport. Facebook | Instagram | Yelp! | Flikr Phone: 949-233-0448 | E-Mail: info@mrfengineering.com |
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 07:11 PM | #11 |
Major
118
Rep 1,441
Posts
Drives: e92 335i, f10 m5 comp
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: jackson, ms
|
i have v2 and its pretty accurate. i reset the odo every time i refuel.
my rule of thumb is that if i can squeeze out about 100 miles per 1/4 tank, thats about 22-23mpg i think. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 07:14 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant Colonel
61
Rep 1,677
Posts |
I get about 320 miles on a full tank . Ticker shoots to 360 but then goes to 310 - 320 after adapting to the shitting driving conditions here in South Florida .
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 07:16 PM | #13 | |
311
Rep 15,745
Posts |
Quote:
I get around 340 on a tank to and from work. My best ever was 514 and 502 miles on one tank of gas. And that was sucking it dry with 5 miles left to go on the tank. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 08:27 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant
13
Rep 412
Posts |
Interesting, if the ECU calculated mileage is close to reality then the ECU must be calculating the mileage based on fuel flow rates from a fuel flow sensor rather than calculating them based on duty cycle and fuel pressure. A seperate flow sensor would be the right way to do it since it would be more accurate.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 08:52 PM | #17 |
Major General
144
Rep 6,608
Posts |
Yes. I am pushing ~370rwhp and I get 20-22mpg with mixed driving....
__________________
I install all tunes, intakes, o2 simms, and most cosmetic mods. PM me for a quote. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-15-2008, 11:30 PM | #18 |
.
878
Rep 3,994
Posts |
I'm at 13.6 right now.
Piggybacks that alter fuel pressure will most likely throw off the accuracy of the MPG reading in the car. It will read higher than your are actually getting.
__________________
2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph
2019 i3s Terra, 2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph 2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds 2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy) |
Appreciate
0
|
07-16-2008, 09:48 AM | #19 | |
Major General
158
Rep 5,776
Posts |
Quote:
That said, this only occurs under heavy load and has a minimal impact. An off the hip guess would equate to less than 0.5 MPG if even that high; it may be as little as a tenth. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-16-2008, 11:25 AM | #20 | |
Lieutenant
13
Rep 412
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-16-2008, 11:40 AM | #21 | |
Lieutenant
13
Rep 412
Posts |
Quote:
Wow, you two either win the leadfoot award or the congested city traffic award. For my city commute I get 19 if the traffic is good and I really baby it or 14-15 if traffic is bad or I'm on it. Downtown I'd probably drop into the 12-13 range. It really all depends on how much stop and go traffic you have. Thanks for the fuel pressure info HotRod, that's what I was wondering. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-16-2008, 03:15 PM | #22 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
70
Rep 1,642
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|