|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Elevation considerations for intercoolers. Cooling capacity vs volume
|
|
01-10-2019, 02:27 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant
224
Rep 418
Posts |
Elevation considerations for intercoolers. Cooling capacity vs volume
I've been thinking about this a bit, and was wondering what y'all think. I spend most of my time driving at around 5000' above sea level, and am looking to go FBO this winter while the car is just sitting in the garage waiting for Spring. Here are some random thoughts, followed by some questions. Feel free to correct anything I have wrong and then put in your $.02.
Is there a give/take in selected an intercooler in higher elevations? With stock turbos might it be prudent to go with a 5" stepped core versus a 7" core intercooler if you are driving exclusively at higher elevation? My goal is to reduce IAT and spool time, which I hope to do with an intercooler, catless dp's, and possibly inlets if it will make a difference with stockers at a stage 2 tune Many people say inlets don't help stock turbos with OTS tunes. Mostly I just want to reduce the load placed on the turbos, so I don't see how it would hurt, unless the low AD makes the turbos work even harder with the larger diameter inlets (think drinking through a straw vs. drinking through a toilet paper tube). I don't intend to run meth. I have access to both ethanol-free 91 oct and e85. I assume I already have DCI and a CP running stock diverter valves. I know the DCI introduces more heat pre-turbo, but also increases airflow over the stock air box. What I want from the car is a reliable DD that makes max power from FBO at 5000' reliably. Everything is updated and running perfectly ATM, including the fueling system, cooling system, and turbos. This is where you correct me, point your finger and laugh, and generally hurl insults my way. Let 'er rip. |
Bookmarks |
|
|