E90Post
 


 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > How can faster 60' times mean lower MPH?



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-10-2008, 11:52 AM   #1
MarioKart
Lieutenant
MarioKart's Avatar
70
Rep
493
Posts

Drives: Black on Black
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ventura, CA

iTrader: (13)

How can faster 60' times mean lower MPH?

I love going to the track but I'm horrible in math, can someone explain how a faster 60' time results in a slower MPH at the end of the 1/4 mile?
Here are my results at my last track event
1st run 2.02 60' @12.52 @ 113mph
2nd run 1.7 60' @ 12.55 @ 111mph

How does this work?
TIA
Mario
__________________
15' YMB M4, TC Kline ℅ camber plates, AWE Exhaust 544whp Stage 1 Map. Past E90 335iA BLK/BLK 19" IForged Daytona, UR Intake, JB3 2.0, RR DP, AA intercooler, HKS BOV, KWV2, 424whp
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 12:15 PM   #2
daixloxbmw
Lieutenant
145
Rep
571
Posts

Drives: Corvette Grand Sport
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

i am no expert but i would guess traction vs power.

having slightly less power will give you better traction for the 0-60 but decrease trap speed.

having slighly more power will give you higher trap speed but may decrease traction for the 0-60.
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 12:22 PM   #3
MarioKart
Lieutenant
MarioKart's Avatar
70
Rep
493
Posts

Drives: Black on Black
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ventura, CA

iTrader: (13)

Quote:
Originally Posted by daixloxbmw View Post
i am no expert but i would guess traction vs power.

having slightly less power will give you better traction for the 0-60 but decrease trap speed.

having slighly more power will give you higher trap speed but may decrease traction for the 0-60.
But we are talking about the same car on the same day with the same amount of power. Both times when I nailed the pedal on the last yellow, I never spun the tires. I launched at 2100 rpm both time on drag tires.
__________________
15' YMB M4, TC Kline ℅ camber plates, AWE Exhaust 544whp Stage 1 Map. Past E90 335iA BLK/BLK 19" IForged Daytona, UR Intake, JB3 2.0, RR DP, AA intercooler, HKS BOV, KWV2, 424whp
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 12:25 PM   #4
sleepdoc
Lieutenant
sleepdoc's Avatar
259
Rep
475
Posts

Drives: 2022 M3CX DG/Blk
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Florida

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by daixloxbmw View Post
i am no expert but i would guess traction vs power.

having slightly less power will give you better traction for the 0-60 but decrease trap speed.

having slighly more power will give you higher trap speed but may decrease traction for the 0-60.
The OP is tallking about the same car with the same power. It is true that a lower 60' usually leads to a better ET, but a slower mph. I have yet to hear a really nice explanation of why this occurs..
__________________
Sold 2018 F80 M3
Sold 2010 Nissan GTR
Sold: 2008 335i
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 12:42 PM   #5
K330i
Second Lieutenant
K330i's Avatar
7
Rep
241
Posts

Drives: 2006 330i
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: East Tennessee

iTrader: (2)

how long in between runs>?

if you don't give enough time between runs you will be slower with each pass.

nothing sucks the performance out of a motor like heat.

btw: nice 1.7 launch...keep it up!!!
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 12:46 PM   #6
vegasspeed
Captain
vegasspeed's Avatar
United_States
84
Rep
761
Posts

Drives: 335i 6MT coupe Montego Blue
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Las Vegas

iTrader: (1)

The lower the 60' time with a stock car the faster you will cross the line before getting up to full speed. If it is the same car and you increase your 60' time chances are you won't need as much speed to pass the 1/4 mile line.
__________________
335i coupe Montego Blue Dinan stage 3 tune, Advan RS wheels 350whp/365wtq
1994 Brooklands Green Acura NSX Comptech Supercharged 390whp/300wtq
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 12:47 PM   #7
MarioKart
Lieutenant
MarioKart's Avatar
70
Rep
493
Posts

Drives: Black on Black
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ventura, CA

iTrader: (13)

Quote:
Originally Posted by K330i View Post
how long in between runs>?

if you don't give enough time between runs you will be slower with each pass.

nothing sucks the performance out of a motor like heat.

btw: nice 1.7 launch...keep it up!!!
They were about one hour between runs and the weather was around a cool 67F. But this fact of a faster 60' time has always confused me.

__________________
15' YMB M4, TC Kline ℅ camber plates, AWE Exhaust 544whp Stage 1 Map. Past E90 335iA BLK/BLK 19" IForged Daytona, UR Intake, JB3 2.0, RR DP, AA intercooler, HKS BOV, KWV2, 424whp
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 12:53 PM   #8
vegasspeed
Captain
vegasspeed's Avatar
United_States
84
Rep
761
Posts

Drives: 335i 6MT coupe Montego Blue
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Las Vegas

iTrader: (1)

Think of it graphically.
A-----------------------finish
B----------------------finish

B is ahead due to the quicker time so I would assume he doesn't need as much speed to cross the line as A would. Just my two cents.
__________________
335i coupe Montego Blue Dinan stage 3 tune, Advan RS wheels 350whp/365wtq
1994 Brooklands Green Acura NSX Comptech Supercharged 390whp/300wtq
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 01:59 PM   #9
jworms
Second Lieutenant
3
Rep
256
Posts

Drives: 99 E36 M3, 07 328i
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redondo Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by vegasspeed View Post
The lower the 60' time with a stock car the faster you will cross the line before getting up to full speed. If it is the same car and you increase your 60' time chances are you won't need as much speed to pass the 1/4 mile line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegasspeed View Post
Think of it graphically.
A-----------------------finish
B----------------------finish

B is ahead due to the quicker time so I would assume he doesn't need as much speed to cross the line as A would. Just my two cents.
very good explanations and they are true...to an extent. There are cases that don't follow these 'rules' like when you have a horrible 60ft time (think low to mid 2s and beyond) compared to a 2.0 or lower. this is because you spent your time spinning off the line instead of accelerating, which actually hurt your trap speed.

it's all about finding that 'efficiency range' for 60ft times that will yield optimal trap speeds.
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 02:03 PM   #10
BALLAJL15
Lieutenant
BALLAJL15's Avatar
27
Rep
569
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California

iTrader: (3)

That was just a weird night... I hit 12.50 only at 109.... with a 60' foot of 1.8
__________________
N55
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 02:23 PM   #11
TheSpungos
Second Lieutenant
United_States
37
Rep
207
Posts

Drives: F80 M3 Tanzanite/Black
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Minneapolis

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarioKart View Post
I love going to the track but I'm horrible in math, can someone explain how a faster 60' time results in a slower MPH at the end of the 1/4 mile?
Here are my results at my last track event
1st run 2.02 60' @12.52 @ 113mph
2nd run 1.7 60' @ 12.55 @ 111mph

How does this work?
TIA
Mario
If you're basing it on these 2 times, something else may have been the issue. You are actually slower on the run with the better 60' time, in addition to trapping lower. The small variable that led to the slower time may have also affected your trap speed.
__________________
2018 M3 - Tanzanite/Black, DCT, Comp, Exec
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 03:01 PM   #12
raceyBMW
king of the hills
raceyBMW's Avatar
112
Rep
2,923
Posts

Drives: 2011 M3 w/ESS55, 2001 540i/6
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arvada, CO

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2001 BMW 540i/6  [8.17]
1994 530i  [9.00]
2007 335i Coupe  [8.37]
You can also lose time in shifts down the line. Don't know if you drive an auto or not, but letting the car automatically shift at redline vs. manually shifting the auto at ~6000rpm can result in a lower speed at the end. It is not going to make much difference in the shift from 1-2, but will in the higher gears. Because of this, you might see the same 0-60 time where the trap speed is slower letting the car auto shift at redline. Same deal will work with a manual too.
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 03:03 PM   #13
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
166
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Not entirely sure, but great times though!
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 03:14 PM   #14
mistermojorizin
Lieutenant Colonel
mistermojorizin's Avatar
40
Rep
1,657
Posts

Drives: 135i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

correct me if i'm wrong, but

lower 60foot = lower ET

lower ET = less time to develop speed

therefore, ceterus paribus, lower 60 foot = less speed
__________________

"KOPEYKA" /// Titanium Silver / Black Leather / Gray Poplar / Sport Package / Premium Package / 6MT / Feb 08 Production
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 03:21 PM   #15
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
166
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mistermojorizin View Post
correct me if i'm wrong, but

lower 60foot = lower ET

lower ET = less time to develop speed

therefore, ceterus paribus, lower 60 foot = less speed
Makes sense.
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 05:08 PM   #16
BavarianBullet
Lieutenant
BavarianBullet's Avatar
United_States
18
Rep
429
Posts

Drives: 2014 Audi S5
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Connecticut

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarioKart View Post
I love going to the track but I'm horrible in math, can someone explain how a faster 60' time results in a slower MPH at the end of the 1/4 mile?
Here are my results at my last track event
1st run 2.02 60' @12.52 @ 113mph
2nd run 1.7 60' @ 12.55 @ 111mph

How does this work?
TIA
Mario
2 runs aren't a statistical sample. You also really need to spend time looking at the whole timeslip especially the 1/8th mile numbers.

Even if you trapped slower on the second run you still should have posted a roughly 12.2x run if the 60ft was 3 tenths faster and everything else was the same.

If you looked at the 1/8th mi numbers and noticed that your car was 90mph in the 1/8th on the 113mph 1/4 and then 88mph 1/8th on the 111mph 1/4 you'd know you gave up some power in the first half of the track. If it all happened at the end of the track, different factors could have contributed to it such as a high water temp or air temp pulling timing for example.

Post up the whole timeslip (numbers not scan) so we can take a look at it.

Great times regardless though!
__________________
2014 Audi S5 DSG
2011 335xi Sedan (retired)
2008 335xi Sedan (retired)
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 05:36 PM   #17
Dan335i
Lieutenant Colonel
Dan335i's Avatar
33
Rep
1,786
Posts

Drives: 07 335i coupe 6MT,w/sp. pack.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: orange county NY

iTrader: (2)

Foreget about the whys,and just get your 60ft times down and you will see your 1/4 mile times drop.
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 07:29 PM   #18
MarioKart
Lieutenant
MarioKart's Avatar
70
Rep
493
Posts

Drives: Black on Black
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ventura, CA

iTrader: (13)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mistermojorizin View Post
correct me if i'm wrong, but

lower 60foot = lower ET

lower ET = less time to develop speed

therefore, ceterus paribus, lower 60 foot = less speed
It looks simple but it seems like with a lower 60' I would be getting up to speed quicker = a higher trap mph
__________________
15' YMB M4, TC Kline ℅ camber plates, AWE Exhaust 544whp Stage 1 Map. Past E90 335iA BLK/BLK 19" IForged Daytona, UR Intake, JB3 2.0, RR DP, AA intercooler, HKS BOV, KWV2, 424whp
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 07:30 PM   #19
MarioKart
Lieutenant
MarioKart's Avatar
70
Rep
493
Posts

Drives: Black on Black
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ventura, CA

iTrader: (13)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BavarianBullet View Post
2 runs aren't a statistical sample. You also really need to spend time looking at the whole timeslip especially the 1/8th mile numbers.

Even if you trapped slower on the second run you still should have posted a roughly 12.2x run if the 60ft was 3 tenths faster and everything else was the same.

If you looked at the 1/8th mi numbers and noticed that your car was 90mph in the 1/8th on the 113mph 1/4 and then 88mph 1/8th on the 111mph 1/4 you'd know you gave up some power in the first half of the track. If it all happened at the end of the track, different factors could have contributed to it such as a high water temp or air temp pulling timing for example.

Post up the whole timeslip (numbers not scan) so we can take a look at it.

Great times regardless though!
Thank you,
I know I have at least one of the time slips, but I will look for them so I scan them
__________________
15' YMB M4, TC Kline ℅ camber plates, AWE Exhaust 544whp Stage 1 Map. Past E90 335iA BLK/BLK 19" IForged Daytona, UR Intake, JB3 2.0, RR DP, AA intercooler, HKS BOV, KWV2, 424whp
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2008, 08:34 PM   #20
mistermojorizin
Lieutenant Colonel
mistermojorizin's Avatar
40
Rep
1,657
Posts

Drives: 135i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarioKart View Post
It looks simple but it seems like with a lower 60' I would be getting up to speed quicker = a higher trap mph
i don't think you would be getting up to speed quicker. at least not necessarily. you're just wasting less time at the starting line by not spinning tires or bogging. but to keep from spinning, you're also not putting down as much power.
__________________

"KOPEYKA" /// Titanium Silver / Black Leather / Gray Poplar / Sport Package / Premium Package / 6MT / Feb 08 Production
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2008, 12:40 AM   #21
hotrod182
.
hotrod182's Avatar
878
Rep
3,994
Posts

Drives: 2023 i4 M50
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

My trap speed went up with DRs. when the 60' time went down.

On DRs

12.133 1.729 113.49mph
12.261 1.80 112.40mph

On Stock RFT

12.633 2.00 111.22 mph
__________________
2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph
2019 i3s Terra,
2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph
2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds
2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy)
Appreciate 0
      10-11-2008, 01:06 AM   #22
Zeph
Major
United_States
29
Rep
1,410
Posts

Drives: 2008 E92 335i 6MT SGM CR/BD
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southeast USA

iTrader: (0)

because if you spin your tires more, you leave the line at a higher rate of speed and therefore in your 1/4 of a mile stretch you go from say 20mph-110 or with more spin you might go from 25-112

that is what I have always thought.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST