OC dyno results

ontopofm · 04-04-2009, 09:32 PM

my mods: V3 Rev I, AR DPs, DCI, VK IC.
I installed VK IC this morning and wanted to see the numbers. This is Dyno Dynamics and the numbers are really low. This was on 91 oct. . On the 3rd pull, I think the car was more adapted and it gained 20 whp more. My previous dyno with V2 and drop in filter (forgot the name) make 315 whp and 350s wtq on dynojet.
Other members who were there this afternoon please post your results in here

dkvby · 04-04-2009, 10:27 PM

how can it be mustang dyno when it say dyno dynamic on the graph?

somethings wrong, the torque just start fallin @ 4400rpm??

ontopofm · 04-04-2009, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkvby

how can it be mustang dyno when it say dyno dynamic on the graph?

im told and what's the diff? Ok found answer. Edited

dkvby · 04-04-2009, 10:33 PM

most dyno dynamics read even lower than most mustang dyno

may be the hose at intercooler has boost leak (clamp not tight?) since u just got the VK installed?

01bird · 04-04-2009, 10:43 PM

So you saw a 20hp gain?

ontopofm · 04-04-2009, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 01bird

So you saw a 20hp gain?

on 3rd run that is but it was running more boost

Ilma · 04-04-2009, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ontopofm

on 3rd run that is but it was running more boost

How did you turn the boost up?

Did the DME adapt itself, or did you bump up the user torque settings?

hun77777 · 04-04-2009, 11:05 PM

was VK IC only variable? meaning you got 20 more whp out of VK IC?

E92Fan · 04-04-2009, 11:09 PM

All the Dyno Dynamics machines read very low - I think they're probably the most conservative dyno out there on the market! Over here in the UK, I ran on a Dyno Dynamics machine, and then a few days later on a Dynojet... the Dynojet gave me 38whp more !!!!

Thing is, most of our good dyno places here in the UK use Dyno Dynamics machines, so I only go by those figures for comparison purposes...

ontopofm · 04-04-2009, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkvby

most dyno dynamics read even lower than most mustang dyno

may be the hose at intercooler has boost leak (clamp not tight?) since u just got the VK installed?

If you look at the dyno sheet where which has just power and boost, it's doesnt look like a boost leak to me. Also the procede data logs, it's saying so

ontopofm · 04-04-2009, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ilma

How did you turn the boost up?

Did the DME adapt itself, or did you bump up the user torque settings?

The dme adpated by itself, i didnt touch anything. I thought boost was supposed to be dropped instead of increased. Notice that on the Procede software it read 15.5 psi but measured 14 psi on dyno

ontopofm · 04-04-2009, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hun77777

was VK IC only variable? meaning you got 20 more whp out of VK IC?

I hope so but I doubt it. I think the car was adapting to the new temp. I didnt do any redline WOT after installed and before the dyno

cn555ic · 04-04-2009, 11:20 PM

yeah but the really issue from the graphs is why the torque dropped at 4400 rpms like someone else stated?

ontopofm · 04-04-2009, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cn555ic

yeah but the really issue from the graphs is why the torque dropped at 4400 rpms like someone else stated?

i just searched for other dyno sheets and it looks like they have the same drop around that rpm, i need experts opinion on this

PaulBailey@ltbmw · 04-05-2009, 12:11 AM

Interesting Graph.
Wish i was able to make it to the dyno day

runningman · 04-05-2009, 12:19 AM

Wow it looks pretty bad. Not the numbers so much, I can understand dynos read differently, but the curves are all over the place. I think the question to ask is there something wrong with your car, or is it just a crappy dyno. If other 335is dynod let us know their results and if the charts were smoother or all over the place.

ontopofm · 04-05-2009, 12:23 AM

forgot to add, all dynos done today are CLOSED HOOD and this is the only fan they used

ontopofm · 04-05-2009, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by runningman

Wow it looks pretty bad. Not the numbers so much, I can understand dynos read differently, but the curves are all over the place. I think the question to ask is there something wrong with your car, or is it just a crappy dyno. If other 335is dynod let us know their results and if the charts were smoother or all over the place.

others charts dont look good either, still waiting for other peeps to post theirs up, come on guys

Mote · 04-05-2009, 01:27 AM

Best part about that dyno sheet is your name!

Jonmartin · 04-05-2009, 02:53 AM

Interesting numbers... Glad I have some 335 numbers to compare against.

PaulBailey@ltbmw · 04-05-2009, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mote

Best part about that dyno sheet is your name!

Thought i was the only one that caught that.
Best name for sure

marty_mcfly · 04-05-2009, 05:20 AM

what do these numbers come out to on a dynojet?

04-04-2009, 09:32 PM	#1
ontopofm Lieutenant Colonel 79 Rep 1,548 Posts Drives: stock Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: CA iTrader: (4)	OC dyno results my mods: V3 Rev I, AR DPs, DCI, VK IC. I installed VK IC this morning and wanted to see the numbers. This is Dyno Dynamics and the numbers are really low. This was on 91 oct. . On the 3rd pull, I think the car was more adapted and it gained 20 whp more. My previous dyno with V2 and drop in filter (forgot the name) make 315 whp and 350s wtq on dynojet. Other members who were there this afternoon please post your results in here Attached Images Last edited by ontopofm; 04-04-2009 at 10:36 PM..
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

04-04-2009, 10:27 PM	#2
dkvby ☠☠☠☠☠ 21 Rep 684 Posts Drives: 07 Blk e92 335i Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: HK iTrader: (3) Garage List 2007 335i Coupe [0.00]	how can it be mustang dyno when it say dyno dynamic on the graph? somethings wrong, the torque just start fallin @ 4400rpm??
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-04-2009, 10:33 PM	#4
dkvby ☠☠☠☠☠ 21 Rep 684 Posts Drives: 07 Blk e92 335i Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: HK iTrader: (3) Garage List 2007 335i Coupe [0.00]	most dyno dynamics read even lower than most mustang dyno may be the hose at intercooler has boost leak (clamp not tight?) since u just got the VK installed?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-04-2009, 10:43 PM	#5
01bird Private First Class 9 Rep 177 Posts Drives: 2008 335i E92 Join Date: May 2008 Location: Dallas iTrader: (8)	So you saw a 20hp gain?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-04-2009, 11:05 PM	#8
hun77777 Brigadier General 199 Rep 4,646 Posts Drives: SG E92 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Seattle WA iTrader: (58)	was VK IC only variable? meaning you got 20 more whp out of VK IC?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-04-2009, 11:09 PM	#9
E92Fan Moderator 334 Rep 5,493 Posts Drives: . Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: . iTrader: (0)	All the Dyno Dynamics machines read very low - I think they're probably the most conservative dyno out there on the market! Over here in the UK, I ran on a Dyno Dynamics machine, and then a few days later on a Dynojet... the Dynojet gave me 38whp more !!!! Thing is, most of our good dyno places here in the UK use Dyno Dynamics machines, so I only go by those figures for comparison purposes... __________________ ... ... ... DMS Remap Review ----- Quaife LSD Review ----- Hartge Antiroll Bars Review ----- Bilstein PSS10 B16 Ride Control Review ----- Detail by ShineOn ----- Paintshield Review
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-04-2009, 11:20 PM	#13
cn555ic 464 Rep 18,331 Posts Drives: 335i Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: US iTrader: (6)	yeah but the really issue from the graphs is why the torque dropped at 4400 rpms like someone else stated?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-05-2009, 12:11 AM	#15
PaulBailey@ltbmw General 678 Rep 26,876 Posts Drives: 2-325 330 2-335 2-Z4 2-135 X5d Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Huntington Beach, CA iTrader: (34) Garage List 2008 BMW 335i E90 [7.00] 2011 BMW 335i E92 [7.96]	Interesting Graph. Wish i was able to make it to the dyno day
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-05-2009, 12:19 AM	#16
runningman Banned 4 Rep 150 Posts Drives: 335i SP Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: nj iTrader: (0)	Wow it looks pretty bad. Not the numbers so much, I can understand dynos read differently, but the curves are all over the place. I think the question to ask is there something wrong with your car, or is it just a crappy dyno. If other 335is dynod let us know their results and if the charts were smoother or all over the place.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-05-2009, 12:23 AM	#17
ontopofm Lieutenant Colonel 79 Rep 1,548 Posts Drives: stock Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: CA iTrader: (4)	forgot to add, all dynos done today are CLOSED HOOD and this is the only fan they used
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-05-2009, 01:27 AM	#19
Mote Colonel 143 Rep 2,162 Posts Drives: 2008 E92 - 1991 E30 Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Beverly Hills, CA iTrader: (0)	Best part about that dyno sheet is your name!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-05-2009, 02:53 AM	#20
Jonmartin Banned 124 Rep 2,097 Posts Drives: E90 M3 Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Los Angles (818) iTrader: (1)	Interesting numbers... Glad I have some 335 numbers to compare against.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-05-2009, 05:20 AM	#22
marty_mcfly Banned 101 Rep 1,209 Posts Drives: ??? Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Cali iTrader: (3)	what do these numbers come out to on a dynojet?
	Appreciate 0 Quote