E90Post
 


Coby Wheel
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > Giac S1 dyno numbers



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-03-2010, 06:27 PM   #1
lito
Colonel
lito's Avatar
Philippines
173
Rep
2,174
Posts

Drives: E92, F30
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DC metro

iTrader: (11)

Giac S1 dyno numbers

Dynoed the car yesterday with Giac S1 with only BMW Perf Exhaust. I was hoping to crack 300+whp with the flash, but as you can see came up a bit short. I was told that Mustang dyno will yield lower numbers than Dynojet but will be more acurate. Will be installing Injen intake, so hopefully that will get me into the 300whp club.




A short video of the dyno run. I have to admit the sound of the BMW Perf exhaust just so exhilarating on high RPM


Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 06:47 PM   #2
Mr. 5
Modder Raider
Mr. 5's Avatar
Scotland
802
Rep
8,633
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB

iTrader: (31)

Garage List
2007 e90 335i  [8.00]
Good job.
Yah, mustang dynos read lower because they apply a load to the dyno, which is more like real world driving conditions.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD

Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 08:18 PM   #3
OpenFlash
United_States
1809
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. 5 View Post
Good job.
Yah, mustang dynos read lower because they apply a load to the dyno to simmulate real world driving conditions.
This is completely untrue. Load is load. The only difference is that a load bearing dyno is able to apply a variable load in order to keep the rate of acceleration (ramp up) constant. Great for tuning since you can, among other things, hold a certain RPM/load combination constant for datalogging/tuning purposes.

But as far as show-your-power runs go, a load bearing dyno (doing a constant ramp test) is actually LESS realistic than an inertial dyno (dynojet) which applies a constant load (ie roller of fixed mass) that results in a variable ramp up rate. Which is more similar to what you would see on the street since the mass of your car is constant.

These "more realistic load" claims really get under my skin because they are often used in the context of an excuse from tuners. When you can't blame the tune, simple, just blame the dyno. This doesn't apply in this case but i've seen it used before by various sales people, from various companies, who should know better.

end of rant

shiv
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 08:49 PM   #4
Mr. 5
Modder Raider
Mr. 5's Avatar
Scotland
802
Rep
8,633
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB

iTrader: (31)

Garage List
2007 e90 335i  [8.00]
Fair enough. Edited my post.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD

Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 09:06 PM   #5
Sniz
Lieutenant General
Sniz's Avatar
682
Rep
10,584
Posts

Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD

iTrader: (1)

stage II and meth stat!

your car looked great in person, I left just as you were getting on the dyno, wish I was still there.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 09:19 PM   #6
tmdb335
Second Lieutenant
tmdb335's Avatar
12
Rep
238
Posts

Drives: 2009 335 xi coupe
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: boyds, md

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lito View Post
Dynoed the car yesterday with Giac S1 with only BMW Perf Exhaust. I was hoping to crack 300+whp with the flash, but as you can see came up a bit short. I was told that Mustang dyno will yield lower numbers than Dynojet but will be more acurate. Will be installing Injen intake, so hopefully that will get me into the 300whp club.




A short video of the dyno run. I have to admit the sound of the BMW Perf exhaust just so exhilarating on high RPM


were you at the CPE dyno day? I was there to with my silver 335.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 09:21 PM   #7
tmdb335
Second Lieutenant
tmdb335's Avatar
12
Rep
238
Posts

Drives: 2009 335 xi coupe
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: boyds, md

iTrader: (2)

I heard that is a really low reading dyno. For reference two of my buddies with evos who put down 380 whp on a dynojet only put 290 on that same dyno.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 10:01 PM   #8
BzzzBom
Major
97
Rep
1,216
Posts

Drives: 05 R53 MINI / 09 335i Coupe
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
This is completely untrue. Load is load. The only difference is that a load bearing dyno is able to apply a variable load in order to keep the rate of acceleration (ramp up) constant. Great for tuning since you can, among other things, hold a certain RPM/load combination constant for datalogging/tuning purposes.

But as far as show-your-power runs go, a load bearing dyno (doing a constant ramp test) is actually LESS realistic than an inertial dyno (dynojet) which applies a constant load (ie roller of fixed mass) that results in a variable ramp up rate. Which is more similar to what you would see on the street since the mass of your car is constant.

These "more realistic load" claims really get under my skin because they are often used in the context of an excuse from tuners. When you can't blame the tune, simple, just blame the dyno. This doesn't apply in this case but i've seen it used before by various sales people, from various companies, who should know better.

end of rant

shiv
I must have had too much beer tonight. I thought this was a GIAC thread.
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 10:03 PM   #9
BrianMN
Banned
117
Rep
2,428
Posts

Drives: 4 Door Family Sedan
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BzzzBom View Post
I must have had too much beer tonight. I thought this was a GIAC thread.
OMG HAHA good one dude...cause he was totally clarifying something related to GIAC
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 10:06 PM   #10
forza1976
Major General
forza1976's Avatar
United_States
3514
Rep
6,627
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 49456

iTrader: (13)

Garage List
2022 BMW M3X  [9.50]
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianMN View Post
OMG HAHA good one dude...cause he was totally clarifying something related to GIAC
+1

I don't understand why everyone is so immediately defensive these days???
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 10:27 PM   #11
Sniz
Lieutenant General
Sniz's Avatar
682
Rep
10,584
Posts

Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BzzzBom View Post
I must have had too much beer tonight. I thought this was a GIAC thread.
yup you must have and yup yes this is
__________________
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2010, 11:32 PM   #12
Brey335i
Banned
118
Rep
4,771
Posts

Drives: e46 ///M3
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (11)

As far as I could understand, Shiv made no attacks on GIAC, but rather on the dyno and what Mr.5 said. I don't really know anything about these things but the way I read it, there was no mention of Procede > GIAC as far as I could tell...

Wow, people really jump on each other here huh? Well, I guess in the end, competition is good... and we do seem to rally together when it comes to hating on other cars like Audi, Mercedes, Nissan, Lamborghini, Bugatti, Ferrari, etc...
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 12:23 AM   #13
MF80
Captain
MF80's Avatar
Thailand
45
Rep
809
Posts

Drives: AW 2008 E92 335i
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Area51

iTrader: (10)

Both hp and torque are too low for my right foot...
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 02:37 AM   #14
cstavaru
Brigadier General
cstavaru's Avatar
328
Rep
3,262
Posts

Drives: 2009 335i M Sport Sedan 6MT
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bucharest, Romania

iTrader: (0)

I obtained 293whp on Mustang with the Power Kit...with a 273 baseline. Do you have a baseline for your car ?
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 05:41 AM   #15
Clap135
Brigadier General
Clap135's Avatar
105
Rep
3,460
Posts

Drives: 2009 N54
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sticky's Mom House

iTrader: (1)

I was also there for the cpe dyno day and I did a base line on my last pull. I ended up getting 252whp on the stock tune and 349 when I plugged in my map.
Mods: dci/chargepipe/meth/v4
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 09:18 AM   #16
BobS
Colonel
BobS's Avatar
98
Rep
2,002
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern NJ

iTrader: (0)

I wouldn't be discouraged.....Check out my thread with GIAC stg1 dyno results, its very different. My car is completely stock besides the tune and my base was 281whp, 321 wtq, with stg 1, I got 348 whp and 378 wtq. A gain of 67 whp, and 57 wtq. Did you do a baseline run to compare? The gains are what matters. If you search you can see my dyno results.
__________________

ESS 650 ACM-R Upgrades
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 10:39 AM   #17
lito
Colonel
lito's Avatar
Philippines
173
Rep
2,174
Posts

Drives: E92, F30
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DC metro

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. 5 View Post
Good job.
Yah, mustang dynos read lower because they apply a load to the dyno, which is more like real world driving conditions.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniz View Post
stage II and meth stat!

your car looked great in person, I left just as you were getting on the dyno, wish I was still there.
yeah S2 is in the future. Yah you missed that sweet sounding BMW Perf exhaust on high RPM.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tmdb335 View Post
were you at the CPE dyno day? I was there to with my silver 335.
Yah got there around 12. I don't recall seeing a silver 335 all I remember seeing was an AW coupe owned by one of the shop employee.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tmdb335 View Post
I heard that is a really low reading dyno. For reference two of my buddies with evos who put down 380 whp on a dynojet only put 290 on that same dyno.
wow! that's a huge difference.
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 10:44 AM   #18
lito
Colonel
lito's Avatar
Philippines
173
Rep
2,174
Posts

Drives: E92, F30
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DC metro

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cstavaru View Post
I obtained 293whp on Mustang with the Power Kit...with a 273 baseline. Do you have a baseline for your car ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobS View Post
I wouldn't be discouraged.....Check out my thread with GIAC stg1 dyno results, its very different. My car is completely stock besides the tune and my base was 281whp, 321 wtq, with stg 1, I got 348 whp and 378 wtq. A gain of 67 whp, and 57 wtq. Did you do a baseline run to compare? The gains are what matters. If you search you can see my dyno results.

Unfortunately the shop I had the car tuned did not have any of the Giac handheld switcher in stock so I couldn't get a baseline run, but I heard few 335i's ran 240 whp on average on that particular dyno machine. So I'm about right on the money as far as gains Giac claims of 51whp and 60trq
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 10:47 AM   #19
lito
Colonel
lito's Avatar
Philippines
173
Rep
2,174
Posts

Drives: E92, F30
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DC metro

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clap135 View Post
I was also there for the cpe dyno day and I did a base line on my last pull. I ended up getting 252whp on the stock tune and 349 when I plugged in my map.
Mods: dci/chargepipe/meth/v4


Yah I bet that car is a blast to drive. Do you have LSD installed?

Last edited by lito; 10-04-2010 at 11:01 AM..
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 02:23 PM   #20
techlogik
Lieutenant Colonel
71
Rep
1,568
Posts

Drives: 2020 M340i Dravit Grey
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FL

iTrader: (2)

So you don't have a baseline? Edit...saw your post, didn't have the map switcher.

I pulled 311rwhp/323rwtq with a Stage 1 Giac and drop in filter on a Dynojet.

It was a 48/48 gain for each respectively over the stock map. Which is probably a few hps over the real stock anyway. So the gain over stock was probably really 50-52 for hp/tq I would guess over a true stock map compared to GIAC's stock map.

I think the gains are in line as advertised. I have an AT...so there is definitely some torque differences in seems compared to an AT.

My dyno post is here: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showth...highlight=giac
__________________
2020 M340i: Dravit Grey Mettalic. Loaded.
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 04:21 PM   #21
TreDirtyFive
Major
United_States
257
Rep
1,341
Posts

Drives: X1 M35i
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA

iTrader: (11)

I also did 320rwhp and about 350rwtq on GIAC S1 on my otherwise stock E92 (dynojet). I was at 275/290 completely stock.
__________________
X3 M40i G01, M235i F22, 335 F30 MSport, 135 DCT, 335 E92, Audi A3

Last edited by TreDirtyFive; 10-04-2010 at 04:31 PM..
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2010, 04:32 PM   #22
Clap135
Brigadier General
Clap135's Avatar
105
Rep
3,460
Posts

Drives: 2009 N54
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sticky's Mom House

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lito View Post
Yah I bet that car is a blast to drive. Do you have LSD installed?
no lsd. I have traction issues, but its alwasy two nasty strips on the ground. An lsd won't help that lol
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST