|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Proper Boost Leak Testing Method?
|
|
04-12-2011, 09:08 AM | #1 |
Captain
36
Rep 708
Posts |
Proper Boost Leak Testing Method?
Hey guys,
I know this has probably been discussed before my time, but what is the proper way to test for boost leaks on the N54? I know on other cars it's as simple as hooking up a PVC end cap directly to the turbo inlet/outlet and pressurizing the system to 20 psi. Our cars are not that simple, and getting to the turbos is a real PITA... I was thinking of plugging one intake pipe and pressurizing the system through the other, but those intake pipes aren't designed for boost... The other option is getting to the hot side of the intercooler and pressurizing from there... but that is one of the connections I want to test for leaks. Anyone have a good method? |
04-12-2011, 09:47 AM | #2 |
Lieutenant General
680
Rep 10,584
Posts |
I did a DIY on this years ago if you can find it.
basically you want to pressurize from the hot side of the intercooler.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2011, 09:54 AM | #3 |
Captain
36
Rep 708
Posts |
Cool, thanks. I just noticed it's in the DIY list as well. Is this the only way though? I just installed a FMIC and want to test the clamps and couplers I just installed.
Last edited by Zasquatch; 04-12-2011 at 10:03 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2011, 10:39 AM | #6 |
Captain
36
Rep 708
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2011, 01:00 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant Colonel
390
Rep 1,571
Posts |
I'd be interested in seeing the low pressure side PCV check valves output as well in form of a leak. This would be blowby past the rings or potentially a leak in the high pressure side PCV check valve which is no good. Pressurizing to say 20psi, locking pressure in by turning off a ball valve... And timing the leakdown to say 10psi is also a good way to determine how sealed off the induction is or isn't.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2011, 01:20 PM | #8 | |
Lieutenant General
680
Rep 10,584
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2011, 01:32 PM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
390
Rep 1,571
Posts |
Thats the point. The more time the better. I've had inductions sealed so well that it would take minutes to drop that. Some standardizations for testing would need developed and from there baselines or aspirations could be drawn. It would also be interesting to figure out exactly from that what or where the DMEs trigger falls into that range.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2011, 01:35 PM | #10 |
Lieutenant Colonel
390
Rep 1,571
Posts |
Also if you didn't use a ball valve to lock in the pressure it will affect your results from a leakdown negatively. I plan on doing this soon, and I want to focus on that high pressure side PCV check valve, I'm skeptical that it's functioning properly in all cases.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2011, 02:46 PM | #11 |
60
Rep 970
Posts |
Smoke testing is the best method to find leaks, any forced induction shop should carry one, as we do.
If you have any questions feel free to email/PM me at anytime! |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|