![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
335i Dyno Number
![]() |
![]() |
03-20-2007, 05:29 PM | #2 |
Private First Class
![]() 5
Rep 168
Posts |
Yep, MSN.CA just tested the 335i. Dyno resullts were the same.
"The general rule is a 15 to 20 per cent loss is normal. Another published dyno test done on a non-turbo 2007 BMW 330i found an approximate 20 per cent loss at the wheels. So using that 20 per cent loss figure, the engine in this particular 335i actually produced 329 hp, and 331 lb-ft of torque. This horsepower rating is just a couple ticks below the outgoing M3, and absolutely humbles the M3’s 262 torque figure. " http://en.autos.sympatico.msn.ca/gui...mentid=4134203
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 05:39 PM | #3 | |
![]() 174
Rep 2,114
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 05:52 PM | #6 |
![]() 174
Rep 2,114
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 08:44 PM | #11 |
301
Rep 6,510
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 08:54 PM | #12 |
Moderator
![]() 670
Rep 10,866
Posts |
The inside #s from Munich back in winter of 2006 were 328 hp. My guess is that is the version that we got. Amazing.
__________________
My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808
my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 ![]() Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279 |
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 09:11 PM | #13 |
Your resident 4um troll
146
Rep 2,020
Posts |
wow most people are 270 -275 ish those are awsome numbers, you sure it wasnt a dynnopack or mustang dyno or w/e those two that read way high are
__________________
![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 11:41 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 26
Rep 455
Posts |
you have very strong numbers for a stock auto...That dyno is in sae and is using a 0 smothing factor....VERY nice looking run bro
I think your car is the one(neo lol)...and don't forget that it was with 91 oct... are you planing on installing the procede?I'll take a stab and say this car will break 360whp with exh.procede,and 93oct |
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 11:58 PM | #16 |
![]() 1849
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Hi guys,
Just one thing to look at. The correction factor down below. It says 1.06 which means that the actual, uncorrected numbers are 270whp and 281lbft (divide SAE corrected numbers by 1.06). Judging by the baro pressure at the bottom of the graph, the test was done well above sea level. This means that the dyno rightfully applied an altitude correction. The only problem is that altitude corrections are only reasonably accurate on naturally aspirated cars. Modern turbo cars, like the 335i, adjust boost pressure to compensate for thin air. So, in effect, the dyno results shown represent a double correction, once by the dyno and once again by the ECU. Nothing shady going on by any means. But the results are overstated in relative terms. It's just one of the things that happens when comparing dyno results taken in different conditions. Cheers, shiv Last edited by OpenFlash; 03-21-2007 at 03:38 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 11:58 PM | #17 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 42
Rep 983
Posts |
It takes like 10 second to do it. All you need to do is just plug a T fitting into any vaccuum/boost line. It depends on the dyno but most dynos comes with the boost sesnor reading unit so it should be standard on your printout.
I have dyno my turbo cars in many dynos: Mustang dyno at vividracing(Phoenix) Mustang dyno at IAperformance in Tucson Dynojet at azdynochip (Phoenix) Dyno Dynamic Dyno at Dynocomp(Phoenix) Dynojet at Apexmotorsports (Tucson) I always got a boost reading. You might got screwed or perhaps the dyno operator did not feel like messing around with your new engine due to lack of knowledge and/ or fear of messing things up. Botton line, it cost nothing extra and can be installed in 5-10 seconds. Carlos |
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2007, 12:28 AM | #18 | |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 42
Rep 983
Posts |
Quote:
I am not blaming on you, like you say, you got a baseline, but a base line can also be with the addition of A/F ratios (you got that) and boost reading(at no extra cost). Don't feel guilty, just ask for you boost reading the next time. My .2c Carlos |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2007, 01:19 AM | #19 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 46
Rep 1,568
Posts |
Here are some dyno vids from the Vishnu tune in Calhoun, GA at Dyno4mance. We got similar numbers using 93 octane. These were before installed use of Procede.
(dyno part 1) (millitek exh. 282.5) (dyno part 3 stock 335i 284.6) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2007, 01:33 AM | #20 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 42
Rep 983
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|