|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Good Morning America's Expose on Gas
|
|
03-26-2007, 08:05 AM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
41
Rep 233
Posts |
Good Morning America's Expose on Gas
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/play...61492&src=news
I guess they don't take turbo/performance cars into consideration |
03-26-2007, 08:26 AM | #2 |
Brigadier General
137
Rep 3,132
Posts |
They dont even take into consideration the fact that regular gas is usually going to be the same. Shell barely puts any of the things they put in 93 in their 87. Complete halfhearted work.
__________________
2018 R35 GT-R Cicio800 | 2007 E92 335i - RB Turbos, TC Kline DA Coils, HPA M3 Suspension, Quaife LSD, Stoptech BBK, JB4, FuelIT, AR Downpipes, RDSport Quads, Stett OC, Helix IC, Volk TE-37, Vorsteiner V-35, OSS Headlights | Retired - 2015 F82 M4
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 04:05 PM | #3 |
Trance Life
333
Rep 4,706
Posts |
She pissed me off at the end where she said "premium gas won't do a thing for you car except drain your wallet." Who died and made you a petroleum engineer?
Apparently they don't include high performance cars in their study. Must be some kind of marketing scheme. To me, it doesn't matter. BMW says premium. I am no way in hell ever running 87 octane from a generic, no name gas station. You CAN'T PAY ME to do that. Be it for peace of mind, thats fine. I'll pay 20 bucks extra for peace of mind a month, I can afford it. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 04:23 PM | #4 |
Free T_e_r_r_Y :)
223
Rep 1,706
Posts
Drives: X3MC, Audi TTRS MK3, 335is DCT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
|
With the 87, it probably doesn't make a difference. I think the test results would be different if they tested various 93s.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 04:44 PM | #5 |
Colonel
29
Rep 2,134
Posts |
Premium as instructed. ...and drain the wallet, it does.
__________________
2007 E92 335i Coupe: Monaco Blue/Premium/Sports/Winter Package/Nav/CA/6MT/TT/Active Cruise/Active Steering/iPod/Rear Shade/Tint/Short Shifter/OEM Alum Pedals//
Last edited by MacAttack; 03-26-2007 at 05:03 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 04:57 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
13
Rep 429
Posts |
She didn't make any false statements, she did preface it by saying, "For 90% of cars, if your owners manual says regular, get regular" and by and large, she'd be correct.
If your car can use 87 octane, going to a higher octane doesn't do any good. The BMW's owner's manual clearly states the minimum octane is premium gas, so that's what you should use. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 05:01 PM | #7 |
Private
3
Rep 89
Posts |
i want to strangle that stupid lady. she knows nothing about cars, shes only on GMA because of her ugly face. what a generic ass report for generic ass people driving generic cars. octane is real, her lips are not!
__________________
e90 335xi black saph on terra, premium, sport, cold weather, steptronic, 18" star spoke style 162
its here! |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 06:12 PM | #9 |
Your resident 4um troll
139
Rep 2,020
Posts |
you guys are a bit confused
when she says premium for thw whole program except her last sentance she meens; shell, mobile 1, ECT vs costco NOT 87 octane vs 93 octane when she says premium at the end shes refering to 87 vs 93, she says nothing wrong, she said that if your manual doesnt say to use premium that your not going to get any benifit, which is true, she didnt say to put 87 in your bmw, ever seen the idiot in the camry filling up with 93 octane? instead of calling the article and the reporter wrong, you should take a second to watch it again anhd pay attention the article didnt have any bad information, everything they said was correct, the only diffrence between stations is the additives, and if your manual says to use regular 87 your not going to get any benefit from premium 93 as for the effect in the diffrence in additives, im not going to comment on that because im not 100% sure
__________________
RAWRrrrr
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 07:01 PM | #10 |
First Lieutenant
30
Rep 372
Posts |
who cares...screw the bitch..just kidding.
i've heard that using 91 on a car meant for 87 does nothing, but using 87 in a car meant for 91 is a no no.
__________________
Ordered 4-25-07 Delivered 7-20-07 E92 335i black sapphire metallic, sport, premium, and Navi. JB4, K&N Drop in, Matte Black Window Trim. Linea Corse Dyna 19x8.5F 19x10R
Previous Ride: 2004 Silverstone 350Z enthusiast. APS TT *Built Motor* at 12PSI. 467rwhp and 413 rwtq. Tuned at ZCARGARAGE. (Missed, but never forgotten) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 07:17 PM | #11 |
311
Rep 15,745
Posts |
87 eh? I guess I will be getting paid to change a lot of fuel pumps and fuel level sensors if everyone believes that one!
Maybe I should play a long with it, and watch my hours each week go through the roof All of my cars have recieved 93, like it or not. It just cost me $46 to fill the tank up (I had 20 miles range left). Do you think I care? You gotta pay if you want to play. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 08:07 PM | #12 | |
Captain
73
Rep 613
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 08:08 PM | #13 |
Private First Class
11
Rep 120
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 08:16 PM | #14 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
55
Rep 1,714
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2007, 08:34 PM | #15 |
Colonel
201
Rep 2,485
Posts |
Well, for the cars you owned in the 'not' category, you wasted your money. Premium did absolutely zilch for you.
__________________
2006 E90 330i (retired)
2009 E90 335i (retired) 2012 E70 X5 50i M Sport (retired) 2016 F10 535i M Sport |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|