|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Catless Dp's decrease mpg?
|
|
09-10-2011, 10:06 PM | #1 |
Captain
70
Rep 656
Posts |
Catless Dp's decrease mpg?
I was wondering if catless downpipes decrease the miles per gallon you get? I have AR catless downpipes if that matters. I currently get 16.3 mpg (as shown on my dash). Is this bad gas mileage for our cars?
|
09-10-2011, 10:13 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 506
Posts |
depends on your driving habits. I tend to waste more gas but then again, now that I am running the car stock I never go WOT anymore.
__________________
and go nuts
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-10-2011, 11:12 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant
11
Rep 452
Posts |
Im at 18.2 with AR catless dps.
I think most people who mod their car think the mods reduce mpg, when really its their foot that gets heavier. |
Appreciate
2
Antetokounmpo1559.50 M_spiels6.00 |
09-10-2011, 11:39 PM | #6 |
<3 Flat Four
219
Rep 757
Posts |
this is true, because technically, with catless downpipes, there is less restriction thus the engine works less to achieve the same level of performance.
__________________
2011 335is Le Mans Blue
2016 X5 xdrive 35i Alpine White |
Appreciate
0
|
09-10-2011, 11:51 PM | #7 |
Captain
70
Rep 656
Posts |
hmm...i wonder if anyone has a definitive answer. because even though the engine does work less, then that means you are running richer which means more flow, resulting in more gas? that's just my guess. but where the mechanics at on e90post???? lol...
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2011, 02:21 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant
86
Rep 590
Posts |
I am inclined to think.....The car breathes easier, and would get better mileage.
Isn't the cat just for emissions?? That's my thought, but I am no expert.
__________________
2021 Mercedes G550
2015 X5M 2020 Supra-JB4, DP 2008 M5 with muffler delete-sold 2007 650i-sold 2008 335i-JB4, DP, Meth-sold |
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2011, 07:18 AM | #11 |
Mad Linux Guru On The Loose
1180
Rep 5,452
Posts
Drives: 2008 335i Sedan, 2023 M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
|
I still get 32-34 mpg on the highway. So it is entirely your driving style.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2011, 08:38 AM | #12 |
E85 is my friend
19
Rep 224
Posts |
I'd have to agree with the driving style comments. Although, IMO the N54's do take quite some time to fully break in. I really didn't start seeing my best MPG until around 45k. My car has all the bolt-ons, and I'm running the catless raceland DP's with a custom SS exhaust which is also catless. Car now has 75k, and runs better now than it ever has. Just made a trip from Phx. AZ to San Jose CA. over the holiday weekend, and I averaged 29.4mpg doing 90+ most of the way with my DJ buddy in the passenger seat, and the car loaded down with DJ gear (she was riding low for sure!!) Not sure how many miles you have on your car, but it can make a difference.
__________________
//sparkling graphite metallic // sport package // logic 7 // m-tech wheel // HID fogs // LED angels // M3 style CF hood // matte black kindney's // AFE DCI // kittyless DP's // custom SS exhaust // Godspeed FMIC // 15ohm JB4// DV Mod //
|
Appreciate
1
idk64.00 |
09-11-2011, 09:43 AM | #13 |
Lieutenant Colonel
68
Rep 1,705
Posts |
catless downpipes would either help, or not change mpg's at all (probably help) given identical conditions/acceleration. if you have a tune, you dash mpg's may not be accurate as sometimes the actual usage varies from what the car thinks. The only real way to gauge mpg's is over long periods of time averaging miles per gallon at each fill up.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2011, 10:33 AM | #15 |
eDDuBB
0
Rep 25
Posts |
It would depend upon your driving habits. The DPs themselves improve pumping efficiencies which improve engine efficiency which given the same operating characteristics would improve milage. So ultimately, it depends on how the vehicle is driven.
DuBB |
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2011, 12:22 PM | #16 | |
Banned
4
Rep 38
Posts |
Quote:
You make more power with catless dp's, BUT when you're at low throttle percentages (ie. cruising) you're not making any power anyway. So, at cruising they'll add mpg for sure. At WOT...they'll probably decrease fuel consumption or not effect it, as you'll be producing more power which requires more fuel. UNLESS, they increase efficiency enough to overcome the need for fuel to make the extra power. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2011, 01:41 PM | #17 |
OEM+ is the shit
34
Rep 543
Posts |
My car has never gone below 19mpg not even at the airfield trackdays (160mph 15-20times). And I have gone from bone stock to FBO no meth and the consumption has alway been the same. I think it's really impressive for a car with steptronic and ~ 380whp
__________________
M-Tech - MFD - 9/10,5x18" BBS E28 - H&R - COBB - Supersprint - BMS - BigTom IC - Ultimate Racing www.Youtube.com/user/CarleeSWE www.Garaget.org/Carlee82 |
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2011, 02:28 PM | #18 |
Colonel
171
Rep 2,875
Posts |
Given the same driving conditions/habits, modded or not, the mpg should be the same if not better.....not to mention that most of the time when on the freeway, we're driving under vacuum, not boost.
But if you're boosting more than usual, then it's obvious that the mpg would go down. More boost=more power=more fuel consumption=less mpg....
__________________
'08 AW E90 335i PROcede V5 | BMS DCI | RR DPs | ETS FMIC | FORGE DVs | Stett CP | Vanguard | PSS10 |
Appreciate
0
|
09-12-2011, 10:01 PM | #21 |
Captain
69
Rep 868
Posts |
I get better mpg when I'm hungover..... Maybe you should drink more
__________________
JB4 G5 ISO , AR DP's, DO Meth kit Trunk Mount, ETS 5" Intercooler, M6 Rims, ER Charge Pipe, Fordged DV's, MMp relocated inlets, Ebay 4" chrome Tips, Lux Angel Eyes **********11.910 @ 117.09***1.851 60'********** |
Appreciate
1
|
Bookmarks |
|
|