[805beemer]

Cobb users, lets compare our 1/4 times using the AP's perfromance menu!

My car is Stage 2+ running aggresive map ST, 53k miles AT.

Didn't get a pic of the 60 ft but it was a miserable 2.5...hard to launch on the ST map. I'll try linear next time. But my trap speed was pretty impressive even if it is off a mph or two. Would be great if someone has a cobb and a vbox to compare how accurate the AP is.

Pic is a little blurry 12.59 at 119.952.

[Zebra99]

That's not bad at all. I'm planning on getting a Cobb AP in the near future and just bought a STETT CAI. Hope I will break low 13's

[themyst]

Cobb trap speeds are a bit overinflated using their timer. I believe it's 4 mph fast. Best way to compare is to run this test at the drag strip.

[abhishriv]

this might be a stupid question, but do you need to keep the cobb AP plugged in the whole time? or can you just plug it in to do the tune and then unplug? :S

[Jeff@TopGearSolutions]

It does not need to be plugged in. It is also recommended not to leave it plugged when the car is off as it will throw codes.

Originally Posted by themyst

Cobb trap speeds are a bit overinflated using their timer. I believe it's 4 mph fast. Best way to compare is to run this test at the drag strip.

agreed

[805beemer]

I realize its not accurate. I was just hoping to see some other stage 2+ users times and trap speeds to compare to my car. I'll find someone with a v box one of these days and get a good comparison between the two. I did do some 1/4 logs on stage 2+ sport map a few months back and bested a 12.9 at 114.5 with a 2.3 60 ft.

[themyst]

Originally Posted by 805beemer

I realize its not accurate. I was just hoping to see some other stage 2+ users times and trap speeds to compare to my car. I'll find someone with a v box one of these days and get a good comparison between the two. I did do some 1/4 logs on stage 2+ sport map a few months back and bested a 12.9 at 114.5 with a 2.3 60 ft.

Just take 4 mph off that time, and it's pretty accurate IMO.

[SaviorXi]

Here is my log from a year ago when I was a stock 335xi coupe automatic with runflats and nothing done to the car but accessport stage 1 and I think it was the map before 2.03





This is what I ran at the track with the same setup. As you can see the time was not as good as the accessport results.



I now have stage 2+ and this was my last track run



stage 2+ gave me a ton of MPH in the quarter

[Zebra99]

Originally Posted by SaviorXi

Here is my log from a year ago when I was a stock 335xi coupe automatic with runflats and nothing done to the car but accessport stage 1 and I think it was the map before 2.03





This is what I ran at the track with the same setup. As you can see the time was not as good as the accessport results.



I now have stage 2+ and this was my last track run



stage 2+ gave me a ton of MPH in the quarter

Great time dude. Kinda sux that that you have to spend so much more to gain 0.3s on your 1/4 time.

Either way, My hat goes off to you sir.
I wanna be in the low 12's

[RnmEvo9]

^Damn AWD!

I should've tried Cobb's timer to compare with my dragstrip results (4037), but I forgot about that feature:

[RnmEvo9]

Originally Posted by Zebra99

Great time dude. Kinda sux that that you have to spend so much more to gain 0.3s on your 1/4 time.

Either way, My hat goes off to you sir.
I wanna be in the low 12's

The trap speed difference is huge though.

[SaviorXi]

Originally Posted by RnmEvo9

The trap speed difference is huge though.

Very true. I just wish I was in the 11's, Maybe when the new Cobb stage 2+ maps come out. We will see.