|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
N54 Engine - Optimum point to change gear
|
|
07-12-2012, 02:55 AM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
28
Rep 252
Posts |
N54 Engine - Optimum point to change gear
Seen some discussions on this and think I remember that the N54 engine its best to change gear around to 6000rpm instead of 7000k, is this true?
Sure one of the more educated members will know if this is correct and the reasons why? I am trying to learn more about cars and the finer details so dont shoot me down if this seems stupid and it should be nearer to redline... Cheers
__________________
NOW SOLD - Counting down to the M3 - E92 May 07' 335i M-Sport - Sapphire Black - Manual - Black Leather Interior - Heated Seats - Bluetooth Handsfree - BMW Performance Black Grill - 19's - Saying No to the Diesel Revolution!
|
07-12-2012, 03:11 AM | #2 |
Major General
1578
Rep 8,971
Posts |
The standard 335i hits a wall and runs out of puff above about 5800rpm, so 6k is about best to drop you back into the torque at about 4.5-5k in the next gear. I'll try and find a dyno curve to illustrate.
The red line isn't really showing you the most power or the best point to shift, it's just saying 'engine may explode above this point' TBH you can rarely get it that high anyway I find, first needs a short shift to prevent traction / wheelspin, then maybe second gear is your only chance to wring it out as 3rd will be doing 100mph by 7K and that's illegal as we all know. Last edited by doughboy; 07-12-2012 at 03:20 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2012, 03:14 PM | #3 |
Major
55
Rep 1,271
Posts |
Wherever they make peak power! there's really no point in revving it any higher if you're wanting to go quick
__________________
Monte Carlo Blue M3 Comp |
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2012, 03:26 PM | #4 | |
Brigadier General
114
Rep 4,021
Posts |
Quote:
It might be beneficial to rev to 6300rpm and have 280bhp than change gear and drop to 270bhp at 4800rpm. Purely guess figures but you get the idea. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2012, 03:33 PM | #5 |
The Tarmac Terrorist
1007
Rep 29,344
Posts
Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
Dav's right deffo.
Mine makes peak power at 8k sha moan!! Dough mate, it wont blow up. It has a limiter.
__________________
997.2 GT3
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2012, 04:11 PM | #6 |
Banned
259
Rep 7,686
Posts
Drives: 335i SE Coupe Space Grey
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: LONDON
|
6k rpm is about right....not much power after that....for the n54
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2012, 04:16 PM | #7 |
Banned
82
Rep 2,396
Posts
Drives: '08 E90 335i
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern NJ
|
~6200 RPMs -- Look at a dyno sheet (or if you can, dyno your car to get the best results) and look for where your powerband starts to dip
Anything above 6,500 RPMs is just for noise |
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2012, 05:32 PM | #8 |
Major
55
Rep 1,271
Posts |
Yea I see what your saying, but if you revved past peak power, shifted and dropped to just bellow, or on peak power, you'll be out of the power band quicker than you would be if you shifted on peak power if you see what I mean?
__________________
Monte Carlo Blue M3 Comp |
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2012, 05:33 PM | #9 |
The Tarmac Terrorist
1007
Rep 29,344
Posts
Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
Don't forget it's got loads of torque!!
__________________
997.2 GT3
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2012, 05:47 PM | #10 |
Major
55
Rep 1,271
Posts |
is peak torque not at like 4-4500?
__________________
Monte Carlo Blue M3 Comp |
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 03:18 AM | #12 |
Major General
1578
Rep 8,971
Posts |
I know mate, I was just saying the redline isn't a shift indicator as perhaps some may think.
My diesel van has a redline at 5k, but it won't rev past 4 even in neutral. The standard N54 makes max torque at about 2krpm then it plateaus (limited by ECU) to about 5k then falls away. Tuned its more peaky, peak at 2k then falls away from there. See my dynos attached, but peak power (tuned) is still only just past 6k. (JB3, map 6, DPs and DCI) Agree with m1jbr, on the road, short shifting by 5.5k makes for faster progress with less noise, ride the torque a little. Last edited by doughboy; 07-13-2012 at 04:23 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 03:51 AM | #13 | |
Drag Addict!
13
Rep 154
Posts |
Quote:
In theory the engine could rev well beyond, but the diesel burn speed limits the engine revs. HTH Andy
__________________
Parts for sale - http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=816229
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 04:28 AM | #14 | |
Major General
1578
Rep 8,971
Posts |
Quote:
In the case of a diesel, you could exceed this by buzzing the engine on an overly agressive downshift. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 08:40 AM | #15 |
LSD - No, you're not seeing things
73
Rep 3,302
Posts |
My point about making a shift at 5,500rpm is reaction time.
If you anticipate a 5k5 shift, in low ranges you will certainly be making 6k maybe more before lifting
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 09:17 AM | #16 | |
Captain
19
Rep 617
Posts |
Quote:
This does raise an interesting point though. I always assumed the best way to get maximum acceleration was to hold onto the gear and change right on the limiter but if peak power and torque arrive way before the limiter then some are suggesting that it's better to shift up earlier. If that is the case though, why if you leave the car in auto\sport mode does it not change up earlier? Surely it should be programmed to change at the optimum change point of 5.5k but it takes it all the way to the limiter. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 11:02 AM | #17 |
Captain
19
Rep 752
Posts |
the thing to watch out for is that you're allowing it to rev high enough, that when you change gear, you don't drop below the power band of the engine.
So changing at 5k for it to drop down to say 3.5k may mean the engine lags a little and you lose power in the change. If you were to hang on to 5.5k for example, you might end up shifting up and being at about 4k, meaning you're on the power and good to go. So sometimes sticking in gear a little longer can have benefits for the amount of available power in the next gear. It's not always about shifting at the cars maximum power point. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 12:24 PM | #18 | |
Banned
259
Rep 7,686
Posts
Drives: 335i SE Coupe Space Grey
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: LONDON
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 01:03 PM | #19 |
Captain
19
Rep 617
Posts |
I suspect the turbo setup in a 335i does confuse the issue somewhat as it makes quite a significant amount of power\torque fairly early whereas in something like an M3, there is a lot more merit in wringing it out, besides just the awesome noise of course.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 01:29 PM | #20 |
Captain
19
Rep 732
Posts |
You want to shift when the next gear gives better acceleration. To figure that out you need to take the torque curve and use that to determine tractive effort at the wheels in each gear, after rolling restistance, air flow resistance and then see what force is left to accelerate the mass of the car. If you plot that you get this graph (for my evolved 320D). You want to shift at each intersection. The graph doens't show rpm, but my spreadsheet show these as optimum.
1st->2nd: 4612rpm 2nd->3rd: 4459 rpm 3rd->4th: 4326rpm 4th->5th: 4179 rpm 5th->6th: 4129 rpm Note that were you shift in the higher gears there is no obvious break point to let you feel were to shift. Question is off course if this model is any good. It shows my car will stop accelerating at at 249 kph if the (level) road was long enough. It has seen 250kph indicated a few times, should be about 240 real, and i believe it could do a bit more more given more road. Good enough for me. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-13-2012, 01:36 PM | #22 | |
Banned
82
Rep 2,396
Posts
Drives: '08 E90 335i
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern NJ
|
Quote:
Low 6k is the optimal shift points, above 6,500 RPMs the turbos are out of their efficency range & you're doing more damage than anything else The S65's peak HP is up really high, design of the motor |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|