Jaguar "R" line

KyleB · 08-09-2007, 01:39 PM

Will Jaguars 'R' line over compete with BMW?

johnwoo19 · 08-09-2007, 01:39 PM

no

KyleB · 08-09-2007, 01:44 PM

Why?

People bash Jaguar often, but why?

GraphiteBrawler · 08-09-2007, 01:51 PM

reliability, weight, ugliness, and old people.

HyperM3 · 08-09-2007, 02:40 PM

My parents had 2 S-type models in a row. The latter was the 4.0 v8. That engine was stellar. It had so much torque and power that it made the tank weight of the car feel less. That being said, all it was was an engine on 4 wheels. The interior was cramped, especially the rear. The plastic on all the controls were taken out of the Ford parts bin. The steering was light and empty. The suspension was wallowy.

I drove an R-type and while it had 100 more hp and much better brakes, it was still made up of the chintzy parts.

My dad went into the 300c with the hemi after the Jags and loves it so much more. Im not a fan of that car either but at least its holding up pretty well and I think it looks better.

TheAcAvenger · 08-09-2007, 02:50 PM

Laughing out loud at jaguar biting off of honda. I wonder where vtec crossover occurs in a jaguar type-R.

HyperM3 · 08-09-2007, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheAcAvenger

Laughing out loud at jaguar biting off of honda. I wonder where vtec crossover occurs in a jaguar type-R.

The same place it intersects the Volvo R line. And Saturn has the S line right? Guess R and S are the raciest letters to associate with "power".

aspiring335 · 08-09-2007, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GraphiteBrawler

reliability, weight, ugliness, and old people.

Jaguars are now some of the most reliable cars available, ranked right up there with Lexus, despite public perception to the contrary.

The use of aluminum in the XJ and XK also mean that they are MUCH lighter than the equivalent 7 series and 6 series. You'll see the same thing in the new XF / S Type replacement.

And finally, the new XK is a truly beautiful car, much more so than the ugly 6.

I can't disagree with you on the old people comment, though...

KyleB · 08-09-2007, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aspiring335

Jaguars are now some of the most reliable cars available, ranked right up there with Lexus, despite public perception to the contrary.

The use of aluminum in the XJ and XK also mean that they are MUCH lighter than the equivalent 7 series and 6 series. You'll see the same thing in the new XF / S Type replacement.

And finally, the new XK is a truly beautiful car, much more so than the ugly 6.

I can't disagree with you on the old people comment, though...

As what I was thinking.

I wasn't to sure about all the bashing people give Jaguar..

Thank you all for the input.

JOYRIIDE1113 · 08-09-2007, 03:45 PM

My brother has an XJ Super V8 (the 7 series equivelant). He also has a Mercedes Benz S550. He constantly claims that he likes the Jag a lot more. Different strokes for different folks. I will say that the Jag looks and feels a million times more luxurious inside.

HyperM3 · 08-09-2007, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KyleB

As what I was thinking.

I wasn't to sure about all the bashing people give Jaguar..

Thank you all for the input.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOYRIIDE1113

My brother has an XJ Super V8 (the 7 series equivelant). He also has a Mercedes Benz S550. He constantly claims that he likes the Jag a lot more. Different strokes for different folks. I will say that the Jag looks and feels a million times more luxurious inside.

I think most people compare the S-type if they are cross-shopping rather than the XJ. The XJ is in another league when it comes to the Jaguar line, they apparently put all their money into that and the XK(which to me is absolutely gorgeous).

However, I think the main focus in BMW sales is the 3 and 5 series which is compared to Jags X-type and S-type. Both of which never really got great reviews and are built with subpar materials.

aspiring335 · 08-09-2007, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HyperM3

However, I think the main focus in BMW sales is the 3 and 5 series which is compared to Jags X-type and S-type. Both of which never really got great reviews and are built with subpar materials.

Agreed. The X-Type is a bit of an embarrassment. Essentially a reskinned Ford Mondeo, but somehow it doesn't handle or ride as well as the car its based on and is much more expensive (although of course we don't get the Mondeo over here). And the S Type is really showing its age now.

Bimmerista · 08-09-2007, 05:36 PM

No. People who buy Jags do so for esthetic and comfort reasons. Not performance. Volvo has decided to discontinue their R line -I would not be surprised to see Jag follow (unless their new owners have new aspirations for Jag).

PS - I find the Xk to be boring and the 6 series beautifull - the 6 has sold so far far in excess of BMW's own expectations-so judging by its commercial success the market agrees with me. The old Xk never sold in great numbers and certainly not in the numbers that the 6 series is selling......

HyperM3 · 08-09-2007, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bimmerista

The old Xk never sold in great numbers and certainly not in the numbers that the 6 series is selling......

One must also take into account the fact theres probably 6 BMW dealerships to every 1 Jag dealership. If its not close, people wont buy.

Cadillac Johnson · 08-10-2007, 01:36 AM

I think the XK looks like a Ford Taurus coupe...

The XJ's have always been beautiful though, full aluminum body, great interiors, just the epitome of luxury IMO.

sinnet112 · 08-11-2007, 04:51 AM

Anyone else not feeling the bug-eyed nature of the new XKs? I always thought the old XK's were some of the classiest vehicles around, as still is the XJ. Maybe it's just me though...

Corsis · 01-24-2008, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadillac Johnson

I think the XK looks like a Ford Taurus coupe...

The XJ's have always been beautiful though, full aluminum body, great interiors, just the epitome of luxury IMO.

Ford Taurus?? Are we talking about the same car?

Its more a baby Aston than anything Ford.

m0n0x!de · 01-24-2008, 10:46 AM

Maybe...it depends on alot of factors...but in my opinion...NO!

gbb357 · 01-24-2008, 11:28 AM

Brought to you buy TATA.

08-09-2007, 01:39 PM	#1
KyleB New Member 4 Rep 27 Posts Drives: . Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Orange California iTrader: (0)	Jaguar "R" line Will Jaguars 'R' line over compete with BMW?
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

08-09-2007, 01:39 PM	#2
johnwoo19 Second Lieutenant 13 Rep 272 Posts Drives: 335i Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC iTrader: (1)	no
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-09-2007, 01:44 PM	#3
KyleB New Member 4 Rep 27 Posts Drives: . Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Orange California iTrader: (0)	Why? People bash Jaguar often, but why?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-09-2007, 01:51 PM	#4
GraphiteBrawler Elton John Impersonator 43 Rep 355 Posts Drives: 2016 LCI M3 Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Boston, MA iTrader: (0)	reliability, weight, ugliness, and old people. __________________ 2016 LCI M3 - Mineral White, SO Extended, 6MT, Exec Package, 18" 513m. 2005 Evo VIII Time Attack: Garrett, Cosworth, ID, Vipec, Ralliart, ARP, Injen, ETS, Walbro, Kognition, OMP, Schroth
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-09-2007, 02:40 PM	#5
HyperM3 Too many Alex's, from now on, call me Beaufort 355 Rep 6,188 Posts Drives: See Sig Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Lawrenceville, NJ iTrader: (8)	My parents had 2 S-type models in a row. The latter was the 4.0 v8. That engine was stellar. It had so much torque and power that it made the tank weight of the car feel less. That being said, all it was was an engine on 4 wheels. The interior was cramped, especially the rear. The plastic on all the controls were taken out of the Ford parts bin. The steering was light and empty. The suspension was wallowy. I drove an R-type and while it had 100 more hp and much better brakes, it was still made up of the chintzy parts. My dad went into the 300c with the hemi after the Jags and loves it so much more. Im not a fan of that car either but at least its holding up pretty well and I think it looks better. __________________ 13 HD FatBob 17 A4 Glacier/Black 1st Edition/Pre+/Sport/EurocodeTMD/Racechip 16 S6 (gone),14 S6 (gone),14 S6 (gone),13 S6 (gone),10 S4 (gone) 07 335i(gone)
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-09-2007, 02:50 PM	#6
TheAcAvenger Brigadier General 137 Rep 3,132 Posts Drives: 2018 R35 GTR / 2007 E92 335i Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: 757 > Nova > Denver iTrader: (1)	Laughing out loud at jaguar biting off of honda. I wonder where vtec crossover occurs in a jaguar type-R. __________________ 2018 R35 GT-R Cicio800 \| 2007 E92 335i - RB Turbos, TC Kline DA Coils, HPA M3 Suspension, Quaife LSD, Stoptech BBK, JB4, FuelIT, AR Downpipes, RDSport Quads, Stett OC, Helix IC, Volk TE-37, Vorsteiner V-35, OSS Headlights \| Retired - 2015 F82 M4
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-09-2007, 03:45 PM	#10
JOYRIIDE1113 Pirate 123 Rep 1,395 Posts Drives: Detailing Shark Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Miami-Kendall iTrader: (1)	My brother has an XJ Super V8 (the 7 series equivelant). He also has a Mercedes Benz S550. He constantly claims that he likes the Jag a lot more. Different strokes for different folks. I will say that the Jag looks and feels a million times more luxurious inside.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-09-2007, 05:36 PM	#13
Bimmerista Major General 85 Rep 5,732 Posts Drives: superstock Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada iTrader: (0)	No. People who buy Jags do so for esthetic and comfort reasons. Not performance. Volvo has decided to discontinue their R line -I would not be surprised to see Jag follow (unless their new owners have new aspirations for Jag). PS - I find the Xk to be boring and the 6 series beautifull - the 6 has sold so far far in excess of BMW's own expectations-so judging by its commercial success the market agrees with me. The old Xk never sold in great numbers and certainly not in the numbers that the 6 series is selling...... __________________ __________________________ 2016 435 xdrive GC white on black leather interior, Msport1, Msport2, premium package 2015 Lincoln MKX, silver on brown leather, premium package - that's right! Techno-Groovy baby
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-10-2007, 01:36 AM	#15
Cadillac Johnson Free taco with stolen base 30 Rep 639 Posts Drives: 335i? GTR? RS5? Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Milwaukee iTrader: (0)	I think the XK looks like a Ford Taurus coupe... The XJ's have always been beautiful though, full aluminum body, great interiors, just the epitome of luxury IMO. __________________ *lllM*
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-11-2007, 04:51 AM	#16
sinnet112 Major 31 Rep 1,118 Posts Drives: 2009 E89 Z4 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: NJ iTrader: (1) Garage List 2007 335i Coupe [0.00] 2007 328xi Sedan [0.00]	Anyone else not feeling the bug-eyed nature of the new XKs? I always thought the old XK's were some of the classiest vehicles around, as still is the XJ. Maybe it's just me though... __________________ Z4 sdrive30i \| Deep Sea Blue \| Ivory White Nappa Extended Leather \| ZSP
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-24-2008, 10:46 AM	#18
m0n0x!de Private First Class 3 Rep 101 Posts Drives: 2003 E46 M3 Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Paris, France iTrader: (0)	Maybe...it depends on alot of factors...but in my opinion...NO! __________________ Apple's market share is bigger than BMW's or Mercedes's or Porsche's in the automotive market. What's wrong with being BMW or Mercedes? Join us: http://www.autofriendship.com
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-24-2008, 11:28 AM	#19
gbb357 Captain 72 Rep 706 Posts Drives: IS300 Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: New York iTrader: (0)	This will be the newest Jaguar. Brought to you buy TATA.
	Appreciate 0 Quote