|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Bad Logs. Any Ideas
|
|
04-23-2013, 11:49 AM | #1 |
Captain
39
Rep 641
Posts |
Bad Logs. Any Ideas
A few weeks ago I put 4 gallons of E85 with my 93 octane. Car drove great and from the logs, the engine loved it. Today I filled up with 93, no E85. I put it on map 1, drove it a little to clear the auto tune, then put it to map 5. Take a look at the logs, they speak for themselves . . . ouch. Any ideas why it would pull so much timing? It is 48 degrees and I am at sea level. The first log is the one of E85+93. The next 2 are after the fill up on 93 alone.
Thanks |
04-23-2013, 11:57 AM | #4 |
Colonel
71
Rep 2,626
Posts |
You can;t expect to support the same timing with and without E85. You definitely expect your timing to be lower on average.
With that said, on map5 in theory, and after it autotunes you shouldn't be seeing timing drops (more than 3 in amplitude). What is the autotune boost?
__________________
'18 F80 M3 Comp 6MT - Stock
'07 E92 335i 6MT- HP650, inlets/outlets, ER FMIC, VRSF CP, LPFP stg2, CSF rad, 'is Aux rad, ER OC, Ohlins, M control arms, eibach front sway bar. '05 C55 AMG SOLD - '22 Tesla M3P | '10 E92 335i M, 6MT | '07 E90 335i, PTF COBB E50, FBO, HFS4 |
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 12:05 PM | #6 |
Colonel
71
Rep 2,626
Posts |
well if it targets 14.5 , it is basically like running map2. Try map 1, and see if your timing looks better. or just rely on the DME to retard your timing continuously
__________________
'18 F80 M3 Comp 6MT - Stock
'07 E92 335i 6MT- HP650, inlets/outlets, ER FMIC, VRSF CP, LPFP stg2, CSF rad, 'is Aux rad, ER OC, Ohlins, M control arms, eibach front sway bar. '05 C55 AMG SOLD - '22 Tesla M3P | '10 E92 335i M, 6MT | '07 E90 335i, PTF COBB E50, FBO, HFS4 |
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 12:08 PM | #7 |
Captain
39
Rep 641
Posts |
Ok. Now granted, those were the first 2 runs after fill up. I will give it a day or 2 and log again. Does the DME always start out in the same spot, say 10 degrees, and then pull based upon feed back? The reason I ask, is I noticed that after it dropped to 5 degrees, it began to gradually climb back up to over 10.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 12:21 PM | #8 | |
Colonel
71
Rep 2,626
Posts |
Quote:
after the timing pull happens it will ramp timing back up gradually in an attempt to hit its targets
__________________
'18 F80 M3 Comp 6MT - Stock
'07 E92 335i 6MT- HP650, inlets/outlets, ER FMIC, VRSF CP, LPFP stg2, CSF rad, 'is Aux rad, ER OC, Ohlins, M control arms, eibach front sway bar. '05 C55 AMG SOLD - '22 Tesla M3P | '10 E92 335i M, 6MT | '07 E90 335i, PTF COBB E50, FBO, HFS4 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 01:31 PM | #9 | |
Captain
39
Rep 641
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 01:37 PM | #10 |
Second Lieutenant
32
Rep 228
Posts |
If thats the first run after fill up, I'm not surprised that it looks like that. Its gonna take 3 pulls on map 5 to fully get the DME to adjust to the new octane, that's why you see significant timing drops. If you compare your logs from your 1st/2nd/3rd pull, you should see it gradually settles in on timing and target boost as it figures the octane level.
Also rather than looking at the graph, pull the csv file as its gonna give you a better picture of what's going on. I find that the graph just doesn't give you the resolution you need to figure out if its a 3degree drop of 5 degree drop. Do a few more logs after it has time to re-learn the new parameters, the timing should smooth out quite a bit. Your target boost sounds about right as when I was on 92 oct, I would target around 14.5psi and when I was on e30 it would be around 17psi. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 03:05 PM | #11 | |
Captain
39
Rep 641
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 03:11 PM | #12 | |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
5034
Rep 116,174
Posts |
Quote:
Mike |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 04:09 PM | #13 |
Second Lieutenant
32
Rep 228
Posts |
Not meaning to hijack the OP's thread but I need clarifying on reading fuel trims (which may also help OP understand more about reading logs). From a graphical standpoint, its the lower the line the better? smoothness? I can't tell what is good from bad. Again, I'm strictly talking about the "trims" variable.
I notice that the OP's graph where e85 shows the fuel trims to be near the top of the graph when the 1st/2nd are lower and it spikes differently. Thanks. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 04:29 PM | #14 | |
Colonel
71
Rep 2,626
Posts |
Quote:
trims are the ability of the DME to compensate by adding or removing fuel to hit it's AFR targets. when you max out your fuel trims that means you will start missing your targets. If you max out in teh positive direction, that means you are at risk of going lean (depending on how much more fuel you needed). etc.. when you add E85 your trims will naturally go higher, and hence you have to monitor and make sure you don't max out. Else you need a flash tune. you care about trims throughout a WOT pull...
__________________
'18 F80 M3 Comp 6MT - Stock
'07 E92 335i 6MT- HP650, inlets/outlets, ER FMIC, VRSF CP, LPFP stg2, CSF rad, 'is Aux rad, ER OC, Ohlins, M control arms, eibach front sway bar. '05 C55 AMG SOLD - '22 Tesla M3P | '10 E92 335i M, 6MT | '07 E90 335i, PTF COBB E50, FBO, HFS4 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|