|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
10" vs 12" JL w3v3
|
|
06-11-2013, 09:38 AM | #1 |
Colonel
386
Rep 2,375
Posts
Drives: 2007 E90 323i (Cdn)
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
10" vs 12" JL w3v3
Hi,
I'm going to be installing a sub in my e90 this weekend. Sub enclosure will go in the spare tire storage under the trunk floor. I know this may / may not be the ideal placement for the woofer, but for various reasons, that's where I've decided to install it. Sub will be powered by a 300w RMS Punch amp (already owned and installed). Ideally I want to go with a 12w3, I always find the 10" woofers look a little small visually. I do understand that the enclosure size will be too small for that 12w3, so wondering how much of a benefit I'll get if I get a 10w3 instead. I'm partial to JL audio due to past experiences (and the clean look of the woofer - it will be visible in the trunk). I know the 10" in that enclosure will be closer to the woofer's "ideal" enclosure size, but how does a 10" in an ideal enclosure perform vs. a 12" in a small one? Anyone got opinions / advice? Will a 10w3: - Sound better than a 12" in that same sized enclosure? - Sound louder? - Hit Deeper / Lower? (I listen to hip hop, reggae, house, electronica) Thanks!!! |
06-11-2013, 12:25 PM | #2 |
Major General
237
Rep 5,118
Posts |
Depends how small it is. In a sealed box it won't really matter if it is just a little too small. The 12 is the better choice if the size is close enough.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2013, 12:30 PM | #3 | |
Colonel
386
Rep 2,375
Posts
Drives: 2007 E90 323i (Cdn)
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Quote:
Enclosure will be approx 0.65-0.7 cubic feet. 10w3 calls for 0.65 12w3 calls for 1.25 (I think). Will the 12 really be that bad? Lose out on some deep bass?
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2013, 01:10 PM | #4 |
Brigadier General
301
Rep 3,969
Posts |
The smaller enclosure will cause a peak at around 80 hz. The low frequency roll off will also be steeper, meaning the really low frequencies - which are present in the music you listen to - will not play as loud as in a larger box. There are much better subwoofers for such an application but if you have to stay with JL then I'd recommend the 10".
__________________
Mobridge DA2 > JBL MS-8 > ARC XDi 600/4 > JBL Gti 408 Mids & Vifa OT19 Tweeters; PG Ti2 1600.5 > Morel HCW-10 & IDMax 15
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2013, 02:41 PM | #5 |
Colonel
386
Rep 2,375
Posts
Drives: 2007 E90 323i (Cdn)
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Thanks Kaigoss!!
I'm particularly partial to JL because: a) I have always had great experience with them in the past (most recently with 2x12w0) b) I have a friend who is an authorized retailer, and can get me either 10w3 or 12w3 at a great price Given my enclosure size will be very close to the recommended size for a 10w3, I think I will go with that. Thanks to all! |
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2013, 07:46 PM | #7 |
Colonel
386
Rep 2,375
Posts
Drives: 2007 E90 323i (Cdn)
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
My installer is custom making it for me. I've seen a few other threads on the forum of people making their own with MDF and/or fiberglass.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-12-2013, 04:07 AM | #8 |
Major General
237
Rep 5,118
Posts |
A 12" alpine type s would work good in that box and can handle 500 watts rms for $100.
http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_...-SWS-12D4.html |
Appreciate
0
|
06-12-2013, 07:52 AM | #9 | |
Colonel
386
Rep 2,375
Posts
Drives: 2007 E90 323i (Cdn)
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-12-2013, 04:36 PM | #10 |
Major General
237
Rep 5,118
Posts |
I have 2 swr12d4's on 2200 watts in a ported box tuned to 33hz. Very happy with them. I had a 15" fi btl before and that got lower, but the type r's have better sq and actually get a little louder.
I'm not sure how the type s would compare to the 12w3 though. Ive used the older model and was able to get some decent output with just one in a sealed box. The power handling went up on the newer model from 300 watts to 500. Maybe somebody that is good with winisd can compare them for you. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-12-2013, 05:15 PM | #11 |
Colonel
386
Rep 2,375
Posts
Drives: 2007 E90 323i (Cdn)
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
On paper, the basic specs are very similar with the Type S and the W3. However, after searching online user reviews, I think it might be an unfair comparison. Sounds like the Type S is better suited against a W0 (or more entry level), while a Type R might be a better comparison for a W3 (I'm guessing).
After reading all the reviews, and considering my own personal bias (I've been a fan of JL for some time now, they haven't disappointed), I think I will stick with the 10W3. IMO, I'd rather sacrifice the 12" to go for a 10" of a woofer that I'm personally happy with, than take a "risk" on a 12" I have no personal experience with. Thanks again to everyone for contributing, and do feel free to continue to chime in with any additional thoughts and suggestions. I love this forum. Such a great resource for us E9X owners. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-12-2013, 05:56 PM | #12 | |
Major General
237
Rep 5,118
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2013, 12:02 PM | #14 | |
Colonel
386
Rep 2,375
Posts
Drives: 2007 E90 323i (Cdn)
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Quote:
In any case, I've decided to go 10". It will still hit low, so I'm sure I'll be happy with it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2013, 12:34 PM | #15 |
First Lieutenant
10
Rep 375
Posts |
If I wanted to stick something in that tiny little space, I would be going with the Boston Acoustic 10" slim sub. Doesn't need much space and it hits amazing for a 10" woofer.
Here is one for 95$ on the bay http://www.ebay.com/itm/G110-4-BOSTO...item1c282e48d1 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-15-2013, 01:54 AM | #16 |
Major General
237
Rep 5,118
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2013, 08:14 PM | #18 |
First Lieutenant
10
Rep 375
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|