![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
VRSF Charge pipe
![]() |
![]() |
02-10-2014, 09:02 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 28
Rep 423
Posts |
VRSF Charge pipe
I was just wondering who all is rocking the VRSF chargepipe. Im thinking about copping one this weekend. I have there downpipes and intercooler and both those are great.
__________________
![]() |
02-10-2014, 09:04 PM | #2 |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 461
Rep 6,478
Posts |
I haven't used it personally but Tiago is a good dude, VRSF is well established on this platform. I'd buy it with confidence.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 09:10 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 28
Rep 423
Posts |
yeah I love there products. Was wondering if anyone with and intake had pics of it installed. Wanna double check the clearance
__________________
![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 09:28 PM | #5 | |
Major
![]() ![]() 269
Rep 1,392
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Have a single turbo and/or tired of burning up O2 sensors? Ask me about the new ADV O2 sensor retro kits!
![]() 335i 2009 e90 665RWHP VFF900 ST RIP ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 09:57 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 28
Rep 423
Posts |
Thats exactly the answer I was looking for. So the BOV has good placement. Thats good to know. And Thanks in advance for the pics
__________________
![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 10:22 PM | #7 |
N54 E92
57
Rep 342
Posts |
People will tell you it's crap... sell it if your'e running methanol... etc.
I personally think it is the only reasonably priced CP on the market. I bought one, tightened that sucker down when I installed it. No issues/Works Great. TiAL Q fit on there nicely as well. There is one issue people will bring up (well actually a couple, but let's focus on this one), if running methanol the bung location is said to not be ideal. I'm not sure how the bung shifted over 4 or 5 inches could greatly affect atomisation (I know LSx guys are commonly injecting almost directly infront of their throttle bodies). To be on the safe side/if it truly is an issue, you can just tap the output side of the intercooler piping for even better atomisation... compared to brand x, y, and z that care "superior" due to their meth bung location.
__________________
![]() Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 10:26 PM | #8 |
N54 E92
57
Rep 342
Posts |
Ignore the 1/4" vacuum tubing, I used 1/4" Fuel Injection Hose because it is reinforced/won't collapse. Use worm gear or corbin clamps.
__________________
![]() Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 10:35 PM | #9 |
N54 E92
57
Rep 342
Posts |
More.
__________________
![]() Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 10:52 PM | #10 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 40
Rep 632
Posts |
I ordered one a couple weeks ago and tracking says I should have it tomorrow! Already got the tial bov in the mail so from the looks of things it should be a quick easy install! I can post pics tomorrow if it comes in. Side note, does anyone that has it already know if it comes with the intake hole covers?
__________________
![]() ![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 10:56 PM | #11 |
![]() 2126
Rep 43,349
Posts |
Thanks for the support guys.
I'll talk to my engineer and see if it's worth it moving the bung a couple inches back. Last I checked it was put where it was due to the ease of installation and intake clearance. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 10:56 PM | #12 | |
N54 E92
57
Rep 342
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
![]() Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 10:58 PM | #13 |
N54 E92
57
Rep 342
Posts |
I didn't see it to be a big deal anyways, especially when you can just tap the intercooler output pipe. But if you go through my threads, the issue is brought up by another vendor. I believe it is the school me on methanol or something like that thread.
__________________
![]() Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 11:04 PM | #14 |
![]() 2126
Rep 43,349
Posts |
Thanks for clearing that up. I've also considered installing a bung on the intercooler's end tank, that may be a better location.
Our kit does include the intake block offs ![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 11:15 PM | #16 |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 461
Rep 6,478
Posts |
Honestly anyone freaking out about atomization via the chargepipe on this platform hasn't looked at the giant hump in cyl1 for the manifold. Pretty 'meh' atomization regardless of where you inject it pre-TB. 3 inches in the charge pipe won't make that much of a difference, intercooler end tanks would be nice. But the only way you're going to get even spray across all cylinders is direct port.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 11:24 PM | #17 |
![]() 2126
Rep 43,349
Posts |
We're going to have a Forge DV setup in the near future, no plans for OEM retention since the plastic dv's are prone to leaking & failure after a few thousand miles and a few more PSI than they're designed to handle.
I've yet to see one OEM platform with plastic DV's that can hold more than OEM boost reliably. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 11:28 PM | #18 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 55
Rep 398
Posts |
That is good to hear. Look forward to the new setup.
I'm not too familiar with the OEM DV but I thought they were setup the same as the Forge DV as in they were interchangeable? |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 11:32 PM | #19 |
![]() 2126
Rep 43,349
Posts |
To accommodate the OEM DV's correctly you'd need a CNC fitting for each DV in order for a proper seal. Simply connecting a coupler and clamp to the OEM DV isn't going to create the correct seal and is poorly done.
With the Forge setup you also have to worry about the maintenance and failure of two DV's rather than one BOV. If sound is your biggest concern, I'd suggest a large diameter high flow valve like the Tial BOV which is quite a bit quieter than your conventional BOV. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 11:53 PM | #21 |
Second Lieutenant
![]() ![]() 15
Rep 239
Posts |
If you don't mind not having the c-clip I am sure this is as good or better (because it is cheaper) than other non-c-clip CPs. I personally liked the c-clip bc I am not a fan of silicon couplers so I went another route. Id sum it up as this ... If u want c-clip connection get ER ... If you want silicon connection get this.
__________________
2009 n54 e90 / Sport Pkg (ZSP) / Premium Pkg (ZPP) / black sapphire metallic / Logic7 / AMS FMIC / BMS 3" DP / BMS OCC / Alpina TCU Flash / ER CP + ForgeDV / Cobb
|
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|